Journal article
What does success mean to you? Negotiating individual definitions of educational success within an examination-dominated regime of truth
- Abstract:
- The meaning of education success is a complex and contested question. In England, as in many countries, this question remains dominated by high-stakes summative assessment, resulting in perverse secondary consequences, detrimental to education itself. In this study, we asked six policy-makers, seven secondary-school teachers and 17 pupils what success meant to them. We extend Broadfoot’s four Cs framework of competence, competition, content, and control, by adding ‘creation’, emphasising how assessment creates the realities it is intended to measure. The study took a grounded theory approach, iterating data collection, literature review, and inductive analysis alongside critical input from a steering committee composed of five study participants. We argue that assessment practices in England create and proliferate a regime of truth which positions high-ranking examination results as the only legitimate meaning of educational success. In school, children discover and determine their interests, identities, and individuality. This process is negotiated with parents, peers, teachers and wider society. We highlight the role that assessment has in engendering competition, controlling choices, and creating identities. Assessment results influence both how we are perceived by others and how we perceive ourselves. We discuss the role that assessment plays in mediating identity negotiation – in shaping, legitimising, and controlling it.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Version of record, pdf, 875.2KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1080/03054985.2024.2439287
Authors
- Publisher:
- Taylor & Francis
- Journal:
- Oxford Review of Education More from this journal
- Volume:
- 51
- Issue:
- 2
- Pages:
- 178-201
- Publication date:
- 2025-03-14
- Acceptance date:
- 2025-01-21
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1465-3915
- ISSN:
-
0305-4985
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
2093555
- Local pid:
-
pubs:2093555
- Deposit date:
-
2025-03-09
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Godfrey-Faussett and Baird
- Copyright date:
- 2025
- Rights statement:
- © 2025 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any med-ium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way. The terms on which this articlehas been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent.
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record