Journal article

There is no 'truthmaker' argument against nominalism

Actions

Email

Email this record

Send the bibliographic details of this record to your email address.

Your Email
Please enter the email address that the record information will be sent to.

-
Your message (optional)
Please add any additional information to be included within the email.
Share
Cite

Cite this record

APA Style

Parsons, J. (1999). There is no 'truthmaker' argument against nominalism. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 77(3), 325–334.

MLA Style

Parsons, J. “There Is No 'Truthmaker' Argument against Nominalism.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy, vol. 77, no. 3, 1999, pp. 325–34.

Chicago Style

Parsons, J. 1999. “There Is No 'Truthmaker' Argument against Nominalism.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 77 (3): 325–34.
Print

Access Document

Publisher copy:: 10.1080/00048409912349081

Authors

+ Parsons, J More by this author

Role:: Author

Journal:: Australasian Journal of Philosophy More from this journal
Volume:: 77
Issue:: 3
Pages:: 325-334
Publication date:: 1999-01-01
DOI:: 10.1080/00048409912349081
EISSN:: 1471-6828
ISSN:: 0004-8402

Language:: English
Pubs id:: pubs:312221
UUID:: uuid:e84b76ae-3d6b-4917-8b7c-3301c48f491a
Local pid:: pubs:312221
Source identifiers:: 312221
Deposit date:: 2012-12-19
ARK identifier:: ark:/29072/ora_e84b76ae3d6b49178b7c3301c48f491a

Terms of use

Copyright date:: 1999

Licence:: Terms and Conditions of Use for Oxford University Research Archive

Views and Downloads

About views and downloads

If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP