Journal article icon

Journal article

Comparison of capability and health-related quality of life instruments in capturing aspects of mental well-being in people with schizophrenia and depression

Abstract:

Background: There is increasing evidence that assessing outcomes in terms of capability provides information beyond that of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) for outcome evaluation in mental health research and clinical practice.

Aims: To assess similarities and differences in the measurement properties of the ICECAP-A capability measure and Oxford Capabilities Questionnaire for Mental Health (OxCAP-MH) in people with schizophrenia experiencing depression, and compare these measurement properties with those of (a) the EuroQol EQ-5D-5L and EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) and (b) mental health-specific (disease-specific) measures.

Method: Using data for 100 patients from the UK, measurement properties were compared using correlation analyses, Bland–Altman plots and exploratory factor analysis. Responsiveness was assessed by defining groups who worsened, improved or remained unchanged, based on whether there was a clinically meaningful change in the instrument scores between baseline and 9-month follow-up assessments.

Results: The two capability instruments had stronger convergent validity with each other (Spearman's rho = 0.677) than with the HRQoL (rho = 0.354–0.431) or the mental health-specific (rho = 0.481–0.718) instruments. The OxCAP-MH tended to have stronger correlations with mental health-specific instruments than the ICECAP-A, whereas the ICECAP-A had slightly stronger correlation with the EQ-VAS. Change scores on the capability instruments correlated weakly with change scores on the HRQoL scales (rho = 0.131–0.269), but moderately with those on mental health-specific instruments for the ICECAP-A (rho = 0.355–0.451) and moderately/strongly on the OxCAP-MH (rho = 0.437–0.557).

Conclusions: Assessing outcomes in terms of capabilities for people with schizophrenia and depression provided more relevant, mental health-specific information than the EQ-5D-5L or the EQ-VAS. The ICECAP-A and the OxCAP-MH demonstrated similar psychometric properties, but the OxCAP-MH was more correlated with disease-specific instruments.

Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions


Access Document


Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1192/bjo.2022.514

Authors


More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-2696-2553
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-3537-5166
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Nuffield Department of Population Health
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0001-9279-8627



Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Journal:
BJPsych Open More from this journal
Volume:
8
Issue:
4
Article number:
e117
Publication date:
2022-06-27
Acceptance date:
2022-05-19
DOI:
EISSN:
2056-4724
Pmid:
35758648


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
1267117
Local pid:
pubs:1267117
Deposit date:
2023-09-05

Terms of use



Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP