Journal article icon

Journal article

Comparison of two T-cell assays to evaluate T-cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 following vaccination in naïve and convalescent healthcare workers

Abstract:
T-cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 following infection and vaccination are less characterized than antibody responses, due to a more complex experimental pathway. We measured T-cell responses in 108 healthcare workers (HCWs) using the commercialized Oxford Immunotec T-SPOT Discovery SARS-CoV-2 assay service (OI T-SPOT) and the PITCH ELISpot protocol established for academic research settings. Both assays detected T-cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 spike, membrane, and nucleocapsid proteins. Responses were significantly lower when reported by OI T-SPOT than by PITCH ELISpot. Four weeks after two doses of either Pfizer/BioNTech BNT162b or ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 AZD1222 vaccine, the responder rate was 63% for OI T-SPOT Panels 1 + 2 (peptides representing SARS-CoV-2 spike protein excluding regions present in seasonal coronaviruses), 69% for OI T-SPOT Panel 14 (peptides representing the entire SARS-CoV-2 spike), and 94% for the PITCH ELISpot total spike. The two OI T-SPOT panels correlated strongly with each other showing that either readout quantifies spike-specific T-cell responses, although the correlation between the OI T-SPOT panels and the PITCH ELISpot total spike was moderate. The standardization, relative scalability, and longer interval between blood acquisition and processing are advantages of the commercial OI T-SPOT assay. However, the OI T-SPOT assay measures T-cell responses at a significantly lower magnitude compared to the PITCH ELISpot assay, detecting T-cell responses in a lower proportion of vaccinees. This has implications for the reporting of low-level T-cell responses that may be observed in patient populations and for the assessment of T-cell durability after vaccination
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Publisher copy:
10.1093/cei/uxac042

Authors

More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-5641-6369
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-4458-1751
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0001-8895-317X
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-1610-5136


Publisher:
Oxford University Press
Journal:
Clinical & Experimental Immunology More from this journal
Volume:
209
Issue:
1
Pages:
90-98
Publication date:
2022-05-06
Acceptance date:
2022-05-05
DOI:
EISSN:
1365-2249
ISSN:
0009-9104


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
1258265
Local pid:
pubs:1258265
Source identifiers:
W4229014733
Deposit date:
2026-08-07
ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP