What is a crime?

Journal article

This article presents a philosophical account of the nature of crime. It argues that the criminal law contains both fault-based crimes and strict liability offences, and that these two represent different paradigms of liability. It goes on to argue that the gist of fault-based crimes lies in their being public wrongs, not (as is often thought) because they wrong the public, but because the public is responsible for punishing them, i.e. because they merit state punishment. What makes wrongs deserving of punishment is that they are seriously blameworthy, inasmuch as they evince a disrespect for the values violated. But they only merit state punishment when they violate important values, not simply due to the well-known pragmatic considerations against the use of the criminal law, but to the intrinsic expressive force of criminal conviction. Finally, the analysis of fault-based crimes points to a role for strict liability in regulating actions that are not seriously blameworthy but do increase the risk of values being damaged. © The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.

Authors: Lamond, G

• Journal: Oxford Journal of Legal Studies
• Volume: 27
• Issue: 4
• Pages: 609-632
• Publication date: 2007-12-01
• DOI: 10.1093/ojls/gqm018
• EISSN: 1464-3820
• ISSN: 0143-6503
• Language: English