Journal article icon

Journal article

Jesus and the Total Available Evidence: Second Response to Cavin and Colombetti

Abstract:

Cavin and Colombetti correctly affirm that in judging the probability of a hypothesis we should take into account “the total available evidence.” However, they neglect their own affirmation when they claim that I make an unwarranted assumption that God would not massively deceive the human race, when they claim that I do not take into account any evidence favoring hypotheses incompatible with the traditional account of what happened to the body of Jesus, and when they claim that I do not ...

Expand abstract
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed
Version:
Accepted Manuscript

Actions


Access Document


Files:
Publisher copy:
10.5840/pc201416230

Authors


More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
College Only
Department:
Oriel College
Oxford college:
Oriel College
Role:
Author
Publisher:
Evangelical Philosophical Society Publisher's website
Journal:
Philosophia Christi Journal website
Volume:
16
Issue:
02
Pages:
419-422
Publication date:
2014-12-23
DOI:
ISSN:
1529-1634
Pubs id:
pubs:1013571
URN:
uri:e5dd00ba-9a49-4176-9755-218561ab404d
UUID:
uuid:e5dd00ba-9a49-4176-9755-218561ab404d
Local pid:
pubs:1013571
Keywords:

Terms of use


Metrics


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP