Journal article
Jesus and the Total Available Evidence: Second Response to Cavin and Colombetti
- Abstract:
- Cavin and Colombetti correctly affirm that in judging the probability of a hypothesis we should take into account “the total available evidence.” However, they neglect their own affirmation when they claim that I make an unwarranted assumption that God would not massively deceive the human race, when they claim that I do not take into account any evidence favoring hypotheses incompatible with the traditional account of what happened to the body of Jesus, and when they claim that I do not take into account the evidence that humans have a strong propensity to private sinning.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Accepted manuscript, pdf, 75.1KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.5840/pc201416230
Authors
- Publisher:
- Evangelical Philosophical Society
- Journal:
- Philosophia Christi More from this journal
- Volume:
- 16
- Issue:
- 02
- Pages:
- 419-422
- Publication date:
- 2014-12-23
- DOI:
- ISSN:
-
1529-1634
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
pubs:1013571
- UUID:
-
uuid:e5dd00ba-9a49-4176-9755-218561ab404d
- Local pid:
-
pubs:1013571
- Source identifiers:
-
1013571
- Deposit date:
-
2019-06-14
- ARK identifier:
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Evangelical Philosophical Society
- Copyright date:
- 2014
- Notes:
- © 2019 Evangelical Philosophical Society. All Rights Reserved.
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record