Journal article
Cosmic CARNage II: the evolution of the galaxy stellar mass function in observations and galaxy formation models
- Abstract:
- We present a comparison of the observed evolving galaxy stellar mass functions with the predictions of eight semi-analytic models and one halo occupation distribution model. While most models are able to fit the data at low redshift, some of them struggle to simultaneously fit observations at high redshift. We separate the galaxies into 'passive' and 'star-forming' classes and find that several of the models produce too many low-mass star-forming galaxies at high redshift compared to observations, in some cases by nearly a factor of 10 in the redshift range $2.5 < z < 3.0$. We also find important differences in the implied mass of the dark matter haloes the galaxies inhabit, by comparing with halo masses inferred from observations. Galaxies at high redshift in the models are in lower mass haloes than suggested by observations, and the star formation efficiency in low-mass haloes is higher than observed. We conclude that many of the models require a physical prescription that acts to dissociate the growth of low-mass galaxies from the growth of their dark matter haloes at high redshift.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Version of record, pdf, 1.1MB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1093/mnras/sty1870
Authors
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- Journal:
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society More from this journal
- Volume:
- 480
- Issue:
- 1
- Pages:
- 1197-1210
- Publication date:
- 2018-07-14
- Acceptance date:
- 2018-07-09
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1365-2966
- ISSN:
-
0035-8711
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
pubs:870357
- UUID:
-
uuid:e5726993-0c69-4e5b-9d82-c1e7b956d1fa
- Local pid:
-
pubs:870357
- Source identifiers:
-
870357
- Deposit date:
-
2018-09-13
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Asquith et al
- Copyright date:
- 2018
- Notes:
- © 2018 The Author(s) Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Astronomical Society. This is the published version of the article. This is also available online from Oxford University Press at: https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty1870
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record