Plato’s recollection argument in the "Philebus"

Journal article

Many scholars have denied that Plato’s argument about desire at Philebus 34c10–35d7 is related to his recollection arguments in the Meno and Phaedo, because it is concerned only with postnatal experiences of pleasure. This paper argues against their denial by showing that the desire argument in question is intended to prove the soul’s possession of innate memory of pleasure. This innateness interpretation will be supported by a close analysis of the Timaeus, where Plato suggests that our inborn desires for food and drink derive from the primitive experiences of pleasure that have naturally been incorporated into the appetitive part of the soul.

Authors: Iwata, N

• Publication status: Published
• Peer review status: Peer reviewed
• Publisher: De Gruyter
• Journal: Rhizomata
• Volume: 6
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 189-212
• Publication date: 2018-12-04
• Acceptance date: 2018-08-06
• DOI: 10.1515/rhiz-2018-0009
• EISSN: 2196-5110
• ISSN: 2196-5102
• Language: English
• Keywords: soul; perception; pleasure; "Timaeus"; recollection; "Meno"; desire; memory; "Phaedo"