Journal article icon

Journal article

Assessing serial recall as a measure of artificial grammar learning

Abstract:
Introduction: Implicit statistical learning is, by definition, learning that occurs without conscious awareness. However, measures that putatively assess implicit statistical learning often require explicit reflection, for example, deciding if a sequence is ‘grammatical’ or ‘ungrammatical’. By contrast, ‘processing-based’ tasks can measure learning without requiring conscious reflection, by measuring processes that are facilitated by implicit statistical learning. For example, when multiple stimuli consistently co-occur, it is efficient to ‘chunk’ them into a single cognitive unit, thus reducing working memory demands. Previous research has shown that when sequences of phonemes can be chunked into ‘words’, participants are better able to recall these sequences than random ones. Here, in two experiments, we investigated whether serial visual recall could be used to effectively measure the learning of a more complex artificial grammar that is designed to emulate the between-word relationships found in language. Methods: We adapted the design of a previous Artificial Grammar Learning (AGL) study to use a visual serial recall task, as well as more traditional reflection-based grammaticality judgement and sequence completion tasks. After exposure to “grammatical” sequences of visual symbols generated by the artificial grammar, the participants were presented with novel testing sequences. After a brief pause, participants were asked to recall the sequence by clicking on the visual symbols on the screen in order. Results: In both experiments, we found no evidence of artificial grammar learning in the Visual Serial Recall task. However, we did replicate previously reported learning effects in the reflection-based measures. Discussion: In light of the success of serial recall tasks in previous experiments, we discuss several methodological factors that influence the extent to which implicit statistical learning can be measured using these tasks.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions


Access Document


Files:
Publisher copy:
10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1497201

Authors


More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author


Publisher:
Frontiers Media
Journal:
Frontiers in Psychology More from this journal
Volume:
15
Article number:
1497201
Publication date:
2024-12-18
Acceptance date:
2024-12-02
DOI:
EISSN:
1664-1078
ISSN:
1664-1078


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
2074023
Local pid:
pubs:2074023
Source identifiers:
2542269
Deposit date:
2025-01-01
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.

Terms of use



Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP