The disparity of frontline clinical staff and managers' perceptions of a quality and patient safety initiative.

Parand, A; Burnett, S; Benn, J; Pinto, A; Iskander, S; Vincent, C

Journal article

The disparity of frontline clinical staff and managers' perceptions of a quality and patient safety initiative.

Abstract:: RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Arguably, a shared perspective between managers and their clinical staff on an improvement initiative would allow for most effective implementation and increase programme success. However, it has been reported that research has failed to differentiate between managers and line employees on quality management implementation and examine their differences in perceptions of quality and safety initiatives. The aim of this study was to compare clinical frontline staff and senior managers' perceptions on the importance of an organization-wide quality and safety collaborative: the Safer Patients Initiative (SPI). METHOD: A quantitative study obtained 635 surveys at 20 trusts participating in SPI. Participants included the teams and frontline staff involved within the programme at each organization. Independent T-tests were carried out between frontline staff and senior managers' perceptions of SPI programme elements, success factors and impact and sustainability. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences were found between the perceptions of frontline staff and senior managers on a wide number of issues, including the frontline perceiving a significantly larger improvement on the timeliness of care delivery (t = 2.943, P = 0.004), while managers perceived larger improvement on the culture within the organization for safe, effective and reliable care (t = -2.454, P = 0.014). CONCLUSION: This study has identified statistically significant disparities in perceptions of an organization-wide improvement initiative between frontline staff and senior managers. This holds valuable implications for the importance of getting both frontline and management perspectives when designing such interventions, in monitoring their performance, and in evaluating their impact.

Actions

Email

Email this record

Send the bibliographic details of this record to your email address.

Your Email
Please enter the email address that the record information will be sent to.

-
Your message (optional)
Please add any additional information to be included within the email.
Cite

Cite this record

APA Style

Parand, A., Burnett, S., Benn, J., Pinto, A., Iskander, S., & Vincent, C. (2011). The disparity of frontline clinical staff and managers' perceptions of a quality and patient safety initiative. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 17(6), 1184–1190.

MLA Style

Parand, A., et al. “The Disparity of Frontline Clinical Staff and Managers' Perceptions of a Quality and Patient Safety Initiative.” Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, vol. 17, no. 6, 2011, pp. 1184–90.

Chicago Style

Parand, A, S Burnett, J Benn, A Pinto, S Iskander, and C Vincent. 2011. “The Disparity of Frontline Clinical Staff and Managers' Perceptions of a Quality and Patient Safety Initiative.” Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 17 (6): 1184–90.
Share
Print