Journal article
To cut up nightingales: what makes an American classicist?
- Abstract:
- If the American “classic” is involved in the dynamic of canons, value, and style, then what is the role of Classics as a field, and of the professional classicist? I argue that with the emergence of the professional classicist came significant anxiety, particularly regarding the transformative and unsettling consequences of specialist research. By discussing ostensibly established classicists like Basil Gildersleeve or Paul Shorey alongside Helen Magill, the first American woman to receive a PhD in Classics, I aim to destabilize the center of what establishment may or may not have meant in light of a shared, unsettled preoccupation with what a professional approach to a canon and a classic could be and ought to be.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Version of record, pdf, 121.5KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.18422/76-2094
Authors
- Publisher:
- Universitatsverlag Gottingen
- Journal:
- New American Studies Journal More from this journal
- Volume:
- 76
- Publication date:
- 2025-02-06
- Acceptance date:
- 2025-01-14
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
2750-7327
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
2091980
- Local pid:
-
pubs:2091980
- Deposit date:
-
2025-02-25
- ARK identifier:
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- New American Studies Journal: A Forum
- Copyright date:
- 2025
- Rights statement:
- © 2025 New American Studies Journal: A Forum. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Licence:
- CC Attribution (CC BY)
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record