Journal article icon

Journal article

The role of trust and hope in antipsychotic medication reviews between GPs and service users a realist review

Abstract:
Abstract Background Increasing number of service users diagnosed with schizophrenia and psychosis are being discharged from specialist secondary care services to primary care, many of whom are prescribed long-term antipsychotics. It is unclear if General Practitioners (GPs) have the confidence and experience to appropriately review and adjust doses of antipsychotic medication without secondary care support. Aim To explore barriers and facilitators of conducting antipsychotic medication reviews in primary care for individuals with no specialist mental health input. Design & setting Realist review in general practice settings. Method A realist review has been conducted to synthesise evidence on antipsychotic medication reviews conducted in primary care with service users diagnosed with schizophrenia or psychosis. Following initial scoping searches and discussions with stakeholders, a systematic search and iterative secondary searches were conducted. Articles were systematically screened and analysed to develop a realist programme theory explaining the contexts (C) and mechanisms (M) which facilitate or prevent antipsychotic medication reviews (O) in primary care settings, and the potential outcomes of medication reviews. Results Meaningful Antipsychotic medication reviews may not occur for individuals with only primary care medical input. Several, often mutually reinforcing, mechanisms have been identified as potential barriers to conducting such reviews, including low expectations of recovery for people with severe mental illness, a perceived lack of capability to understand and participate in medication reviews, linked with a lack of information shared in appointments between GPs and Service Users, perceived risk and uncertainty regarding antipsychotic medication and illness trajectory. Conclusions The review identified reciprocal and reinforcing stereotypes affecting both GPs and service users. Possible mechanisms to counteract these barriers are discussed, including realistic expectations of medication, and the need for increased information sharing and trust between GPs and service users.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1186/s12888-021-03355-3
Publication website:
https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/bitstream/10026.1/18060/1/s12888-021-03355-3.pdf

Authors

More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0001-7010-871X
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-7083-6589
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0001-7411-9467
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-9497-5874
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-1214-6974


Publisher:
BioMed Central
Journal:
BMC Psychiatry More from this journal
Volume:
21
Issue:
1
Pages:
390-390
Article number:
390
Publication date:
2021-08-04
DOI:
EISSN:
1471-244X
ISSN:
1471-244X


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
1190297
Local pid:
pubs:1190297
Source identifiers:
W3188730612
Deposit date:
2026-03-25
ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP