Journal article
Ontological query answering under many-valued group preferences in Datalog+/–
- Abstract:
- The Web has recently been changing more and more to what is called the Social Semantic Web. As a consequence, the ranking of search results no longer depends solely on the structure of the interconnections among Web pages. In this paper, we argue that such rankings can be based on user preferences from the Social Web and on ontological background knowledge from the Semantic Web. We propose an approach to top-k query answering under user preferences in Datalog+/– ontologies, where the queries are unions of conjunctive queries with safe negation, and the preferences are defined via numerical values. To this end, we also generalize the previous RankJoin algorithm to our framework. Furthermore, we explore the generalization to the preferences of a group of users. Finally, we provide experimental results on the performance and quality of our algorithms.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Accepted manuscript, pdf, 903.6KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1016/j.ijar.2017.11.008
Authors
+ European Union
More from this funder
- Grant:
- H2020Research
- InnovationProgrammeundertheMarieSklodowska-CuriegrantagreementNo.690974fortheproject“MIREL”
- Publisher:
- Elsevier
- Journal:
- International Journal of Approximate Reasoning More from this journal
- Volume:
- 93
- Pages:
- 354-371
- Publication date:
- 2017-12-01
- Acceptance date:
- 2017-11-16
- DOI:
- ISSN:
-
0888-613X
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
pubs:812325
- UUID:
-
uuid:e3618e17-626b-404d-9a8d-8a152c33e349
- Local pid:
-
pubs:812325
- Source identifiers:
-
812325
- Deposit date:
-
2018-01-20
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Elsevier Inc
- Copyright date:
- 2017
- Notes:
- Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. This is the accepted manuscript version of the article. The final version is available online from Elsevier at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2017.11.008
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record