Journal article : Comment
Governments must reconcile dissonant climate assessment approaches
- Abstract:
- Security analysts and government economists increasingly present policymakers with different pictures of the same climate and nature risk. We argue that governments need a shared way to weigh these assessments, particularly given that under-preparing for a severe, irreversible outcome costs far more than over-preparing.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Accepted manuscript, pdf, 382.1KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1038/s41558-026-02736-4
Authors
- Publisher:
- Springer Nature
- Journal:
- Nature Climate Change More from this journal
- Volume:
- 16
- Issue:
- 10
- Pages:
- 1118-1120
- Publication date:
- 2026-09-29
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1758-6798
- ISSN:
-
1758-678X
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- Subtype:
-
Comment
- Pubs id:
-
2465062
- Local pid:
-
pubs:2465062
- Source identifiers:
-
W7214774378
- Deposit date:
-
2026-10-14
- ARK identifier:
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Springer Nature Limited
- Copyright date:
- 2026
- Rights statement:
- © 2026, Springer Nature Limited
- Notes:
- The author accepted manuscript (AAM) of this paper has been made available under the University of Oxford's Open Access Publications Policy, and a CC BY public copyright licence has been applied.
- Licence:
- CC Attribution (CC BY)
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record