Journal article icon

Journal article

A comparison of comorbidity measures for predicting mortality after elective hip and knee replacement: A cohort study of data from the National Joint Registry in England and Wales

Abstract:
Background The risk of mortality following elective total hip (THR) and knee replacements (KR) may be influenced by patients’ pre-existing comorbidities. There are a variety of scores derived from individual comorbidities that can be used in an attempt to quantify this. The aims of this study were to a) identify which comorbidity score best predicts risk of mortality within 90 days or b) determine which comorbidity score best predicts risk of mortality at other relevant timepoints (30, 45, 120 and 365 days). Patients and methods We linked data from the National Joint Registry (NJR) on primary elective hip and knee replacements performed between 2011–2015 with pre-existing conditions recorded in the Hospital Episodes Statistics. We derived comorbidity scores (Charlson Comorbidity Index—CCI, Elixhauser, Hospital Frailty Risk Score—HFRS). We used binary logistic regression models of all-cause mortality within 90-days and within 30, 45, 120 and 365-days of the primary operation using, adjusted for age and gender. We compared the performance of these models in predicting all-cause mortality using the area under the Receiver-operator characteristics curve (AUROC) and the Index of Prediction Accuracy (IPA). Results We included 276,594 elective primary THRs and 338,287 elective primary KRs for any indication. Mortality within 90-days was 0.34% (N = 939) after THR and 0.26% (N = 865) after KR. The AUROC for the CCI and Elixhauser scores in models of mortality ranged from 0.78–0.81 after THR and KR, which slightly outperformed models with ASA grade (AUROC = 0.77–0.78). HFRS performed similarly to ASA grade (AUROC = 0.76–0.78). The inclusion of comorbidities prior to the primary operation offers no improvement beyond models with comorbidities at the time of the primary. The discriminative ability of all prediction models was best for mortality within 30 days and worst for mortality within 365 days. Conclusions Comorbidity scores add little improvement beyond simpler models with age, gender and ASA grade for predicting mortality within one year after elective hip or knee replacement. The additional patient-specific information required to construct comorbidity scores must be balanced against their prediction gain when considering their utility
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1371/journal.pone.0255602

Authors

More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0001-8654-353X
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-2436-9024
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-9940-1095
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-3015-0432
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0001-5577-3674


More from this funder
Funder identifier:
10.13039/501100000265
Grant:
MR/L01226X/1


Publisher:
Public Library of Science
Journal:
PLoS ONE More from this journal
Volume:
16
Issue:
8
Pages:
e0255602-e0255602
Publication date:
2021-08-12
DOI:
EISSN:
1932-6203
ISSN:
1932-6203


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
1191379
Local pid:
pubs:1191379
Source identifiers:
W3190946477
Deposit date:
2026-03-25
ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP