Hazlitt and the critique of idolatry

Journal article

Abstract:: This essay argues that idolatry is an important and still underappreciated theme in William Hazlitt’s philosophical and political writing, as well as his art criticism. It considers examples from across Hazlitt’s career, showing that his theory of idolatry-critique was informed both his early Unitarian education, and by his participation in the intellectual culture of the parliamentary reform movement during and immediately after the wars with France. In making this argument, I aim to provide an updated account of Hazlitt’s analysis of the post-Revolutionary interplay between ministerial oppression and popular consent. I will also show that these very same political dynamics drove Hazlitt to embrace an alternative, “virtuous”, mode of idolatry, centered on the ambiguous figure of Napoleon Buonaparte. At a broader methodological level, I wish to push back against the view that iconoclasm and idolatry-critique are inherently expressions of reductive dogmatism. The example of Hazlitt suggests that unflinching criticism of idols need not lead to intellectual or political sterility.

Files:: Carver_2026_Hazlitt_and_the.pdf

(Preview, Version of record, pdf, 640.8KB, Terms of use)

Copyright holder:: Dylan Carver
Rights statement:: © 2026 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in anymedium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way. The terms on whichthis article has been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent.

If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record