Journal article icon

Journal article

Stability of thyroid function in older adults: the Birmingham Elderly Thyroid Study

Abstract:
Background Thyroid function tests (TFTs) are among the most requested tests internationally. However, testing practice is inconsistent, and potentially suboptimal and overly costly. The natural history of thyroid function remains poorly understood. Aim To establish the stability of thyroid function over time, and identify predictors of development of overt thyroid dysfunction. Design and setting Longitudinal follow-up in 19 general practices in the UK. Method A total of 2936 participants from the Birmingham Elderly Thyroid Study (BETS 1) with a baseline TFT result indicating euthyroid or subclinical state were re-tested after approximately 5 years. Change in thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), free thyroxine (FT4), and thyroid status between baseline and follow-up was determined. Predictors of progression to overt dysfunction were modelled. Results Participants contributed 12 919 person-years; 17 cases of overt thyroid dysfunction were identified, 13 having been classified at baseline as euthyroid and four as having subclinical thyroid dysfunction. Individuals with subclinical results at baseline were 10- and 16-fold more likely to develop overt hypothyroidism and hyperthyroidism, respectively, compared with euthyroid individuals. TSH and FT4 demonstrated significant stability over time, with 61% of participants having a repeat TSH concentration within 0.5 mIU/L of their original result. Predictors of overt hypothyroidism included new treatment with amiodarone (odds ratio [OR] 92.1), a new diagnosis of atrial fibrillation (OR 7.4), or renal disease (OR 4.8). Conclusion High stability of thyroid function demonstrated over the 5-year interval period should discourage repeat testing, especially when a euthyroid result is in the recent clinical record. Reduced repeat TFTs in older individuals is possible without conferring risk, and could result in significant cost savings.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions


Access Document


Files:
Publisher copy:
10.3399/bjgp18x698861

Authors



Publisher:
Royal College of General Practitioners
Journal:
British Journal of General Practice More from this journal
Volume:
68
Issue:
675
Pages:
e718-e726
Publication date:
2018-09-27
Acceptance date:
2018-06-10
DOI:
EISSN:
1478-5242
ISSN:
0960-1643
Pmid:
30154078


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
pubs:911903
UUID:
uuid:e1542040-2965-46ca-ba5f-372510fa8727
Local pid:
pubs:911903
Source identifiers:
911903
Deposit date:
2018-10-04

Terms of use



Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP