Journal article
Stability of thyroid function in older adults: the Birmingham Elderly Thyroid Study
- Abstract:
- Background Thyroid function tests (TFTs) are among the most requested tests internationally. However, testing practice is inconsistent, and potentially suboptimal and overly costly. The natural history of thyroid function remains poorly understood. Aim To establish the stability of thyroid function over time, and identify predictors of development of overt thyroid dysfunction. Design and setting Longitudinal follow-up in 19 general practices in the UK. Method A total of 2936 participants from the Birmingham Elderly Thyroid Study (BETS 1) with a baseline TFT result indicating euthyroid or subclinical state were re-tested after approximately 5 years. Change in thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), free thyroxine (FT4), and thyroid status between baseline and follow-up was determined. Predictors of progression to overt dysfunction were modelled. Results Participants contributed 12 919 person-years; 17 cases of overt thyroid dysfunction were identified, 13 having been classified at baseline as euthyroid and four as having subclinical thyroid dysfunction. Individuals with subclinical results at baseline were 10- and 16-fold more likely to develop overt hypothyroidism and hyperthyroidism, respectively, compared with euthyroid individuals. TSH and FT4 demonstrated significant stability over time, with 61% of participants having a repeat TSH concentration within 0.5 mIU/L of their original result. Predictors of overt hypothyroidism included new treatment with amiodarone (odds ratio [OR] 92.1), a new diagnosis of atrial fibrillation (OR 7.4), or renal disease (OR 4.8). Conclusion High stability of thyroid function demonstrated over the 5-year interval period should discourage repeat testing, especially when a euthyroid result is in the recent clinical record. Reduced repeat TFTs in older individuals is possible without conferring risk, and could result in significant cost savings.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Accepted manuscript, pdf, 124.1KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.3399/bjgp18x698861
Authors
- Publisher:
- Royal College of General Practitioners
- Journal:
- British Journal of General Practice More from this journal
- Volume:
- 68
- Issue:
- 675
- Pages:
- e718-e726
- Publication date:
- 2018-09-27
- Acceptance date:
- 2018-06-10
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1478-5242
- ISSN:
-
0960-1643
- Pmid:
-
30154078
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
pubs:911903
- UUID:
-
uuid:e1542040-2965-46ca-ba5f-372510fa8727
- Local pid:
-
pubs:911903
- Source identifiers:
-
911903
- Deposit date:
-
2018-10-04
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- British Journal of General Practice
- Copyright date:
- 2018
- Notes:
- Copyright © 2018 British Journal of General Practice. This is the accepted manuscript version of the article. The final version is available online from the Royal College of General Practitioners at: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp18x698861
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record