Journal article icon

Journal article

Hip fracture care in Zimbabwe : a cohort-based health economic analysis

Abstract:
AimsHip fractures are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, particularly among older people. While early surgical management improves outcomes compared to non-surgical approaches, high costs of surgery pose significant barriers in low- and middle-income countries. A cost-utility analysis of hip fracture management was undertaken in Zimbabwe, to guide resource allocation and policy.MethodsPatient-level data were obtained from a prospective cohort of adults aged 40 years and above with acute hip fractures presenting to hospital in Harare (two public; five private) between October 2021 and October 2022. Healthcare resource use and costs in 2023 USD$ were assessed from individual billing data, with imputed values used for missing resources. Health outcomes were measured in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), defined as the ratio of incremental costs to incremental QALYs, were estimated using a regression approach. Sensitivity analyses assessed the impact of different assumptions on cost-effectiveness.ResultsThe cohort had 190 patients with an average age of 72 years (SD 14.3), and 51% (n = 97) were male; 61% (n = 116) had surgery for their hip fracture. Patients who underwent surgery had 0.17 (95% CI 0.10 to 0.25) additional QALYs and incurred substantially higher healthcare costs: $1,676 (95% CI 730 to 2,621) higher per patient. The ICER for the primary analysis was $9,647/QALY gained. Restricting the analysis to patients who did not experience extensive surgical delays resulted in smaller difference in costs and an ICER of $4,126/QALY gained. The results were sensitive to the exchange rate used to estimate costs.ConclusionAlthough patients who underwent surgery for hip fractures had higher costs, they had better health outcomes in terms of QALYs. Targeted improvements in provision of surgical care, particularly in minimizing surgical delays, could improve both patient outcomes and lower healthcare costs.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1302/2633-1462.610.bjo-2025-0107.r1

Authors


More from this funder
Funder identifier:
https://ror.org/029chgv08


Publisher:
British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
Journal:
Bone & Joint Open More from this journal
Volume:
6
Issue:
10
Pages:
1179-1189
Publication date:
2025-10-03
DOI:
EISSN:
2633-1462
ISSN:
2633-1462
Pmid:
41038619


Language:
English
UUID:
uuid_e140459f-a928-4080-b0eb-c0908ee4f221
Source identifiers:
3362559
Deposit date:
2025-10-11
ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP