Journal article icon

Journal article

Ghosts in the machine: famines and the afterlives of empire

Abstract:
What did ‘afterlife’ mean to the rulers, agents and subjects of modern empires? Why did ‘afterlife’ emerge as a key narrative device in their attempts to make sense of how empire worked? My suggestion here is that ‘afterlife’ was a heuristic that both confirmed and contested the ‘scientific’ rules of modern empires. It became a staple of a wide range of literary and cultural genres – from gothic and ‘sensation’ fiction to memoirs, romances, histories and scientific and medical treatise – to the extent that we might think of it being a crucial component of the imperial life-world itself.
Publication status:
Accepted
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Authors

More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
HUMS
Department:
English
Oxford college:
Wolfson College
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0009-0005-7161-4776


Publisher:
Taylor & Francis
Journal:
Atlantic Studies: Global Currents More from this journal
Acceptance date:
2025-12-09
EISSN:
1740-4649
ISSN:
1478-8810


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
2357308
Local pid:
pubs:2357308
Deposit date:
2026-01-09
ARK identifier:


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP