Preprint icon

Preprint

The effect of pulse shape in theta-burst stimulation: monophasic vs biphasic TMS

Abstract:

Background Intermittent theta-burst stimulation (i)(TBS) is a transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) plasticity protocol. Conventionally, TBS is applied using biphasic pulses due to hardware limitations. However, monophasic pulses are hypothesised to recruit cortical neurons more selectively than biphasic pulses, thus yielding stronger plasticity effects. Monophasic and biphasic TBS can be generated using a custom-made pulse-width modulation-based TMS device (pTMS).

Objective Using pTMS, we tested the hypothesis that monophasic iTBS would induce greater plasticity effects than biphasic, measured as induced changes in motor corticospinal excitability.

Methods In a repeated-measures design, thirty healthy volunteers participated in three separate sessions, where monophasic and biphasic iTBS was applied to the primary motor cortex (M1 condition) or the vertex (control condition). Plasticity was quantified as changes in motor corticospinal excitability after versus before iTBS, by comparing peak-to-peak amplitudes of motor evoked potentials (MEP) measured at baseline and over 60 minutes after iTBS.

Results Both monophasic and biphasic M1 iTBS led to significant increases in MEP amplitude. As predicted, monophasic iTBS induced a significantly larger effect than biphasic iTBS (linear mixed effect model analysis: (χ2(1) = 7.48, p = 0.006), which persisted even after subtracting each individual’s control (vertex) condition data from the M1 conditions (χ2(1) = 5.48, p = 0.019).

Conclusions In this study, monophasic iTBS induced a stronger motor corticospinal excitability increase than biphasic within participants. This greater physiological effect suggests that monophasic iTBS may also have potential for greater functional impact, of interest for future fundamental and clinical applications of TBS.

Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Not peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Files:
Preprint server copy:
10.1101/2023.03.06.531158

Authors

More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MPLS
Department:
Engineering Science
Role:
Author
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Clinical Neurosciences
Role:
Author
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Clinical Neurosciences
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-5542-5036
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Clinical Neurosciences
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-2232-9598
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MPLS
Department:
Engineering Science
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-5404-4004


More from this funder
Funder identifier:
https://ror.org/029chgv08
Grant:
203139/A/16/Z
203139/Z/16/Z
215451/Z/19/Z
224430/Z/21/Z
More from this funder
Funder identifier:
https://ror.org/0187kwz08
Grant:
NIHR203316
More from this funder
Funder identifier:
https://ror.org/00xkj2889


Preprint server:
bioRxiv
Publication date:
2023-04-27
DOI:
EISSN:
2692-8205


Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP