Journal article icon

Journal article : Review

The Efficacy of Injectable Atelocollagen in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract:
A rotator cuff (RC) tear can result in shoulder dysfunction and pain. Arthroscopic repair has been used for complete or advanced partial tears. However, the rates of retear and non-healing remain a challenge postoperatively. We aim to investigate the efficacy of injecting atelocollagen in combination with arthroscopic repair in patients with complete or partial RC tears. We performed an electronic search using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library up to the 7th of October 2025. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies that evaluate atelocollagen as an adjunct to arthroscopic repair of RC tears were included. Primary outcomes were retear rate (Sugaya IV-V) and pain (visual analog scale (VAS)), and functional outcomes (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (ASES) and Korean Shoulder Score (KSS)) at 12 months. Additionally, we evaluated the overall risk of bias (ROB) of each included study using the RoB2 tool for RCTs and the ROBINS-I tool for cohorts. Pooled analyses were performed using Review Manager 5.4 with random-effects modeling applied when heterogeneity was detected. Five studies, including a total of 743 patients, were included, with 376 using the intervention. We found a lower retear rate in the atelocollagen group that was statistically insignificant (RR=0.75, p=0.25). Additionally, the pooled analysis of VAS pain score showed a non-significant reduction in favor of atelocollagen (MD=-0.31, p=0.45). Functional outcomes at 12 months revealed no significant differences: ASES score (MD=-2.16, p=0.06) and KSS score (MD=0.26, p=0.91). For shoulder ROM, we detected non-significant differences in forward flexion (MD=-1.03°, p=0.73), external rotation (MD=-0.86°, p=0.74), or internal rotation (MD=0.06, p=0.81). Despite statistical insignificance, atelocollagen administration during RC arthroscopic repair showed a consistent trend toward improved healing, particularly in retear rate and VAS pain. Further large and well-designed trials are warranted to confirm its clinical benefits.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Files:
Publisher copy:
10.7759/cureus.99255

Authors

More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author


Publisher:
Springer
Journal:
Cureus: Journal of Medical Science More from this journal
Volume:
17
Issue:
12
Pages:
e99255
Publication date:
2025-12-15
Acceptance date:
2025-12-14
DOI:
EISSN:
2168-8184
ISSN:
2168-8184
Pmid:
41487814


Language:
English
Keywords:
Subtype:
Review
Pubs id:
2358972
UUID:
uuid_e0246e78-2d53-486c-b26a-ccd376eb388a
Local pid:
pubs:2358972
Source identifiers:
3656504
Deposit date:
2026-01-13
ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP