Journal article icon

Journal article

Barriers, facilitators, and the role of central coordination: understanding long COVID-19 healthcare access in a universal healthcare system

Abstract:
Background: This study comprehensively analyses healthcare access barriers and facilitators encountered by long COVID-19 patients in a universal healthcare system, including the potential role of central coordination units in alleviating the patient burden. Study design: Retrospective cross-sectional long COVID-19 patient questionnaire survey. Methods: Data collection took place 10–12/2024 in Austria (n = 433). Conceptualized along the five steps of the ‘access to care’ framework, the questionnaire covered 47 barriers and 10 facilitators derived from a previous qualitative study. Descriptive statistics, Whitney-Mann-U and t-tests, as well as linear and ordered logistic regressions were used in the statistical analysis. Results: Barriers were encountered in all access steps with the mean number of barriers considered problematic being 31.9 (SD 8.4) out of 47. The most common barriers were lacking information and the burden of self-organising one’s treatment (perceived as problematic by over 90%), followed by the need to consult private (non-contracted) doctors due to insufficient expertise in the public sector and difficulties in treating symptoms by GPs and specialists (85%). Participants living in federal states offering central coordination encountered statistically significantly fewer barriers, perceiving a mean of 17.4 barriers (SD 9.7) as very problematic compared to 21.0 (SD 9.2). Differences were particularly pronounced regarding the availability of services within the public sector and incurred costs although the overall burden remained high. Main facilitators included family and friends and the (information) exchange with other patients. Conclusions: Our findings have important policy and research implications beyond the Austrian context, supporting the establishment of central coordination units and research assessing the effectiveness and implementation of long COVID-19 pathways to improve patients’ healthcare access.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Publisher copy:
10.1186/s13690-025-01783-1

Authors

More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0009-0002-4286-2285
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-6689-3708
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0001-8760-4250
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Psychiatry
Sub department:
Psychiatry
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0001-9279-8627
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-4448-0478


Publisher:
BioMed Central
Journal:
Archives of Public Health More from this journal
Volume:
83
Issue:
1
Pages:
286
Article number:
286
Publication date:
2025-11-27
Acceptance date:
2025-11-10
DOI:
EISSN:
2049-3258
ISSN:
2049-3258


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
2336205
UUID:
uuid_de96fd31-f911-4ee9-8850-d9debed596c2
Local pid:
pubs:2336205
Source identifiers:
3514627
Deposit date:
2025-11-27
ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP