Identifying Patterns of Clinical Interest in Clinicians’ Treatment Preferences: Hypothesis-free Data Science Approach to Prioritizing Prescribing Outliers for Clinical Review

MacKenna, B; Curtis, HJ; Hopcroft, LEM; Walker, AJ; Croker, R; Macdonald, O; Evans, SJW; Inglesby, P; Evans, D; Morley, J; Bacon, SCJ; Goldacre, B

AI Collection

Journal article

Identifying Patterns of Clinical Interest in Clinicians’ Treatment Preferences: Hypothesis-free Data Science Approach to Prioritizing Prescribing Outliers for Clinical Review

Abstract:: BACKGROUND: Data analysis is used to identify signals suggestive of variation in treatment choice or clinical outcome. Analyses to date have generally focused on a hypothesis-driven approach. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop a hypothesis-free approach to identify unusual prescribing behavior in primary care data. We aimed to apply this methodology to a national data set in a cross-sectional study to identify chemicals with significant variation in use across Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) for further clinical review, thereby demonstrating proof of concept for prioritization approaches. METHODS: Here we report a new data-driven approach to identify unusual prescribing behaviour in primary care data. This approach first applies a set of filtering steps to identify chemicals with prescribing rate distributions likely to contain outliers, then applies two ranking approaches to identify the most extreme outliers amongst those candidates. This methodology has been applied to three months of national prescribing data (June-August 2017). RESULTS: Our methodology provides rankings for all chemicals by administrative region. We provide illustrative results for 2 antipsychotic drugs of particular clinical interest: promazine hydrochloride and pericyazine, which rank highly by outlier metrics. Specifically, our method identifies that, while promazine hydrochloride and pericyazine are barely used by most clinicians (with national prescribing rates of 11.1 and 6.2 per 1000 antipsychotic prescriptions, respectively), they make up a substantial proportion of antipsychotic prescribing in 2 small geographic regions in England during the study period (with maximum regional prescribing rates of 298.7 and 241.1 per 1000 antipsychotic prescriptions, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our hypothesis-free approach is able to identify candidates for audit and review in clinical practice. To illustrate this, we provide 2 examples of 2 very unusual antipsychotics used disproportionately in 2 small geographic areas of England

Publication status:: Published

Peer review status:: Peer reviewed

Actions

Email

Email this record

Send the bibliographic details of this record to your email address.

Your Email
Please enter the email address that the record information will be sent to.

-
Your message (optional)
Please add any additional information to be included within the email.
Share
Cite

Cite this record

APA Style

MacKenna, B., Curtis, H. J., Hopcroft, L. E. M., Walker, A. J., Croker, R., Macdonald, O., Evans, S. J. W., Inglesby, P., Evans, D., Morley, J., Bacon, S. C. J., & Goldacre, B. (2022). Identifying Patterns of Clinical Interest in Clinicians’ Treatment Preferences: Hypothesis-free Data Science Approach to Prioritizing Prescribing Outliers for Clinical Review. JMIR Medical Informatics, 10(12), e41200–e41200.

MLA Style

MacKenna, B, et al. “Identifying Patterns of Clinical Interest in Clinicians’ Treatment Preferences: Hypothesis-Free Data Science Approach to Prioritizing Prescribing Outliers for Clinical Review.” JMIR Medical Informatics, vol. 10, no. 12, 2022, pp. e41200–e41200.

Chicago Style

MacKenna, B, HJ Curtis, LEM Hopcroft, et al. 2022. “Identifying Patterns of Clinical Interest in Clinicians’ Treatment Preferences: Hypothesis-Free Data Science Approach to Prioritizing Prescribing Outliers for Clinical Review.” JMIR Medical Informatics 10 (12): e41200–e41200.
Print