Journal article icon

Journal article

Multifaceted Assessment of Amazonian Tree Diversity Reveals Pervasive Impacts of Human Modification

Abstract:
Tropical forests harbour the majority of tree species on the planet but are increasingly subjected to deforestation and human‐driven disturbances. Understanding how human modifications impact various facets of diversity—i.e., taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic—is crucial, as their responses can differ significantly. Additionally, the influence of species dominance and individual size class on the recovery trajectories of future forests is often overlooked. Here, we address these knowledge gaps by comparing the taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic diversities of large (≥ 10 cm DBH) and small (≤ 2 cm DBH < 10 cm DBH) trees in undisturbed and human‐modified Amazonian forests, considering different weights of species dominance using Hill Numbers. We sampled 25,313 large and 30,070 small trees across 215 forest plots distributed in two different regions of Eastern Amazonia and representing a range of human modification (i.e., undisturbed, logged, logged‐and‐burned, and secondary forests). Our findings indicate that human modifications significantly reduce the taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic diversities of both large and small trees, regardless of dominance weightings. Secondary forests exhibited the lowest alpha‐diversity and were the most dissimilar to undisturbed forests, while logged‐and‐burned forests were as distinct from undisturbed forests as they were from secondary forests across all diversity facets. Taxonomic and functional diversity showed similar sensitivity to human modification, while phylogenetic diversity was the least sensitive in alpha‐diversity but equally sensitive in community composition analyses. Overall, we showed that human modification explained 55% of the effect size variation found in alpha‐diversity and 42% of that found in community composition, with diversity facet, tree size and dominance weighting explaining either ≤ 5%. Given the deleterious impacts of human modification on the diversity of tropical forests, it is imperative to protect remaining undisturbed areas from selective logging and wildfires. Nevertheless, even disturbed primary forests still harbour more taxonomic, functional and phylogenetic diversity than secondary forests.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Authors

More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0001-8157-8792
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-2783-0210
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0001-9190-3229
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author


More from this funder
Funder identifier:
https://ror.org/0482b5b22
More from this funder
Funder identifier:
https://ror.org/03wnrjx87
More from this funder
Funder identifier:
https://ror.org/012mzw131
More from this funder
Funder identifier:
https://ror.org/02b5d8509


Publisher:
Wiley
Journal:
Global Change Biology More from this journal
Volume:
31
Issue:
11
Article number:
e70595
Publication date:
2025-11-10
Acceptance date:
2025-10-08
DOI:
EISSN:
1365-2486
ISSN:
1354-1013


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
2322175
Local pid:
pubs:2322175
Source identifiers:
3457217
Deposit date:
2025-11-10
ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP