Journal article icon

Journal article

What is quality in assisted living technology? The ARCHIE framework for effective telehealth and telecare services.

Abstract:

Background

We sought to define quality in telehealth and telecare with the aim of improving the proportion of patients who receive appropriate, acceptable and workable technologies and services to support them living with illness or disability.

Methods

This was a three-phase study: (1) interviews with seven technology suppliers and 14 service providers, (2) ethnographic case studies of 40 people, 60 to 98 years old, with multi-morbidity and assisted living needs and (3) 10 co-design workshops. In phase 1, we explored barriers to uptake of telehealth and telecare. In phase 2, we used ethnographic methods to build a detailed picture of participants’ lives, illness experiences and technology use. In phase 3, we brought users and their carers together with suppliers and providers to derive quality principles for assistive technology products and services.

Results

Interviews identified practical, material and organisational barriers to smooth introduction and continued support of assistive technologies. The experience of multi-morbidity was characterised by multiple, mutually reinforcing and inexorably worsening impairments, producing diverse and unique care challenges. Participants and their carers managed these pragmatically, obtaining technologies and adapting the home. Installed technologies were rarely fit for purpose. Support services for technologies made high (and sometimes oppressive) demands on users. Six principles emerged from the workshops. Quality telehealth or telecare is 1) ANCHORED in a shared understanding of what matters to the user; 2) REALISTIC about the natural history of illness; 3) CO-CREATIVE, evolving and adapting solutions with users; 4) HUMAN, supported through interpersonal relationships and social networks; 5) INTEGRATED, through attention to mutual awareness and knowledge sharing; 6) EVALUATED to drive system learning.

Conclusions

Technological advances are important, but must be underpinned by industry and service providers following a user-centred approach to design and delivery. For the ARCHIE principles to be realised, the sector requires: (1) a shift infocus from product (‘assistive technologies’) to performance (‘supporting technologies-in-use’); (2) a shift in thecommissioning modelfrom standardised to personalised home care contracts; and (3) a shift in thedesign model from‘walled garden’, branded products to inter-operable components that can be combined and used flexibly across devices and platforms.

Please see related article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0305-8.

Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions


Access Document


Publisher copy:
10.1186/s12916-015-0279-6

Authors


More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Primary Care Health Sciences
Role:
Author


Publisher:
BioMed Central
Journal:
BMC Medicine More from this journal
Volume:
13
Issue:
1
Pages:
91
Publication date:
2015-01-01
DOI:
EISSN:
1741-7015
ISSN:
1741-7015


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
pubs:519483
UUID:
uuid:dd1a1dbe-bb7c-4d11-b7bb-eab5f1fbf2ea
Local pid:
pubs:519483
Source identifiers:
519483
Deposit date:
2016-01-24

Terms of use



Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP