Journal article icon

Journal article

Responsibility is not required for authorship

Abstract:

The Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) maintains that AIs (artificial intelligences) cannot be authors of academic papers, because they are unable to take responsibility for them. COPE appears to have the answerability sense of responsibility in mind. It is true that AIs cannot be answerable for papers, but responsibility in this sense is not required for authorship in the sciences. I suggest that ethics will be forced to follow suit in dropping responsibility as a criterion for authorship or rethinking its role. I put forward three options for authorship: dropping responsibility as a criterion for authorship, retaining it and excluding AIs, but at the cost of substantial revision of our practices, or requiring only local responsibility for an intellectual contribution.

Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions


Access Document


Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1136/jme-2024-109912

Authors


More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
HUMS
Department:
Philosophy Faculty
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-5679-1986


More from this funder
Funder identifier:
https://ror.org/0505m1554
Grant:
AH/W005077/1


Publisher:
BMJ Publishing Group
Journal:
Journal of Medical Ethics More from this journal
Volume:
51
Issue:
4
Pages:
230-232
Publication date:
2024-05-15
Acceptance date:
2024-03-24
DOI:
EISSN:
1473-4257
ISSN:
0306-6800
Pmid:
38749650


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
1997915
Local pid:
pubs:1997915
Deposit date:
2024-07-16

Terms of use



Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP