Journal article
Husserl on Hume
- Abstract:
- This article offers an account of the development of Husserl’s assessment of Hume’s position in the history of philosophy. In Husserl’s early treatment of Hume, Husserl’s interpretation was shaped by the anti-Kantian views of his teacher Franz Brentano. Later, however, Husserl concentrated on those themes in Hume’s philosophy that were of relevance for the development of his own conception of phenomenology. His analysis into the a priori structures of intentionality led the Husserl of Logical Investigations (1900-1901) to reject Hume’s nominalism and sensualism, and to criticize Hume’s naturalistic psychologism and fictionalism. Already at this point, however, Husserl appreciated Hume’s metaphysical neutrality as well as his radical starting point in the immediate givenness of consciousness. In the period following Husserl’s transcendental turn in Ideas I (1913), Hume is gradually re-assessed in the context of Husserl’s engagement with Kant as a philosopher who offers important insights concerning concrete problems of transcendental philosophy. For Husserl, Hume ultimately offers the first outline of a pure phenomenology and, indeed, becomes one of the most important forerunners of transcendental philosophy as such.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Accepted manuscript, pdf, 245.9KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1080/09608788.2019.1678457
Authors
- Publisher:
- Taylor and Francis
- Journal:
- British Journal for the History of Philosophy More from this journal
- Volume:
- 28
- Issue:
- 3
- Pages:
- 615-635
- Publication date:
- 2019-11-12
- Acceptance date:
- 2019-10-07
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1469-3526
- ISSN:
-
0960-8788
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
pubs:1061091
- UUID:
-
uuid:db1fe734-c18c-4bba-9c21-793689a89306
- Local pid:
-
pubs:1061091
- Source identifiers:
-
1061091
- Deposit date:
-
2019-10-07
- ARK identifier:
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- BSHP
- Copyright date:
- 2019
- Rights statement:
- © 2019 BSHP
- Notes:
- This is the accepted manuscript version of the article. The final version is available from Taylor and Francis at: https://doi.org/10.1080/09608788.2019.1678457
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record