Journal article icon

Journal article : Review

Viral cultures for assessing airborne infectiousness of SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract:
Introduction: There is uncertainty about the quantification, viability and infectivity of SARS-CoV-2 in air samples. Our objective was to systematically review the evidence for air sample virus infectiousness with high-level confirmatory studies. Methods: We conducted literature searches in LitCovid, medRxiv, PubMed, the WHO Covid-19 databases, and Google Scholar. We included studies that assessed viral infectiousness in the air using viral culture or serial qRT-PCR with or without genomic sequencing. Our primary outcome was the proportion of culture-positive air samples of SARS-CoV-2. Secondary outcomes explored the relationship between infectiousness and Cycle threshold (Ct). We used published methods for assessing quality, and R software for meta-analysis. Results: We included 26 studies that used viral culture to assess air sample positivity of SARS-CoV-2. The overall reporting quality was moderate. The overall pooled frequency of positive viral cultures was 14% (95% CI 7–17, I2 = 52.3%; p = 0.001). The data were not sufficient to compute a threshold for infectivity, or to explore the relationship between distance and infectiousness. Conclusions: The proportion of positive SARS-CoV-2 viral cultures following positive RNA samples in the air is low, suggesting that while viral RNA may be present, the likelihood of detecting culturable, infectious viruses is substantially lower. Our findings underscore the need for standardized guidelines to assess and report the infectivity and potential for transmissibility of airborne viruses, including the consistent reporting of Ct values and methods to mitigate bias.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1186/s12879-025-12430-z

Authors

More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author


Publisher:
BioMed Central
Journal:
BMC Infectious Diseases More from this journal
Volume:
26
Issue:
1
Article number:
297
Publication date:
2025-12-25
Acceptance date:
2025-12-18
DOI:
EISSN:
1471-2334
ISSN:
1471-2334


Language:
English
Keywords:
Subtype:
Review
Pubs id:
2355300
UUID:
uuid_d9af3b27-f580-4494-bc33-ab4a19545f1b
Local pid:
pubs:2355300
Source identifiers:
3743004
Deposit date:
2026-02-09
ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP