Journal article
A Get Out The Vote (GOTV) experiment on the world's largest participatory budgeting vote in Brazil
- Abstract:
- Does non-partisan voter mobilization affect the popular vote? We use vote records from a state-level participatory budgeting vote in Brazil– the world’s largest –to assess the impact of voter mobilization messaging on turnout and support for public investments. The government provided records as to how each ballot was cast and designed the tabulation process so that votes could be matched to treatment assignment without compromising the secrecy of the ballot. Citizens (n=43,384) were randomly assigned to receive non-partisan email and text messages designed to encourage voting. We document an impressive 4.7 percentage point increase in online voting in our treatment group. However, we found no effect of messaging on vote choice; voters in the treatment and control groups shared the same sectoral preferences and showed no difference in the average cost of public investment projects they supported. These results suggest non-partisan Get Out the Vote campaigns can increase citizen participation without skewing the outcome.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Accepted manuscript, pdf, 555.3KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1017/S0007123417000412
Authors
- Publisher:
- Cambridge University Press
- Journal:
- British Journal of Political Science More from this journal
- Volume:
- 50
- Issue:
- 1
- Pages:
- 381-389
- Publication date:
- 2017-11-01
- Acceptance date:
- 2017-05-17
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1469-2112
- ISSN:
-
0007-1234
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
pubs:695566
- UUID:
-
uuid:d4d09e70-350d-4140-9b95-487b3f5c6245
- Local pid:
-
pubs:695566
- Source identifiers:
-
695566
- Deposit date:
-
2017-05-17
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Cambridge University Press
- Copyright date:
- 2017
- Notes:
- © Cambridge University Press 2017 .This is the author accepted manuscript following peer review version of the article. The final version is available online from Cambridge University Press at: 10.1017/S0007123417000412
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record