Journal article
KiDS-i-800: Comparing weak gravitational lensing measurements from same-sky surveys
- Abstract:
- We present a weak gravitational lensing analysis of 815 deg2of i-band imaging from the Kilo-Degree Survey (KiDS-i-800). In contrast to the deep r-band observations, which take priority during excellent seeing conditions and form the primary KiDS data set (KiDS-r-450), the complementary yet shallower KiDS-i-800 spans a wide range of observing conditions. The overlapping KiDS-i-800 and KiDS-r-450 imaging therefore provides a unique opportunity to assess the robustness of weak lensing measurements. In our analysis we introduce two new 'null' tests. The 'nulled' two-point shear correlation function uses a matched catalogue to show that the calibrated KiDS-i-800 and KiDS-r-450 shear measurements agree at the level of 1 ± 4 per cent.We use five galaxy lens samples to determine a 'nulled' galaxy-galaxy lensing signal from the full KiDS-i-800 and KiDS-r-450 surveys and find that the measurements agree to 7 ± 5 per cent when the KiDS-i-800 source redshift distribution is calibrated using either spectroscopic redshifts, or the 30-band photometric redshifts from the COSMOS survey.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Version of record, pdf, 3.4MB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1093/mnras/sty859
Authors
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- Journal:
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society More from this journal
- Volume:
- 477
- Issue:
- 4
- Pages:
- 4285-4307
- Publication date:
- 2018-04-05
- Acceptance date:
- 2018-04-03
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1365-2966
- ISSN:
-
0035-8711
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
pubs:708444
- UUID:
-
uuid:d3492846-1631-4fb6-8be6-75fd57aec206
- Local pid:
-
pubs:708444
- Source identifiers:
-
708444
- Deposit date:
-
2018-10-06
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Amon et al
- Copyright date:
- 2018
- Notes:
- © 2018 The Author(s) Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Astronomical Society. This is the accepted manuscript version of the article. The final version is available online from Oxford University Press at: https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty859
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record