- Abstract:
-
The Doomsday argument purports to show that the risk of the human species going extinct soon has been systematically underestimated. This argument has something in common with controversial forms of reasoning in other areas, including: game theoretic problems with imperfect recall, the methodology of cosmology, the epistomology of indexical belief, and the debate over so-called fine-tuning arguments for the design hypothesis. The common denominator is a certain premiss: the Self-Sampling Assu...
Expand abstract - Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
- Version:
- Author's Original
- Publisher:
- Kluwer Academic Publishers Publisher's website
- Journal:
- Synthese Journal website
- Volume:
- 127
- Issue:
- 3
- Pages:
- 359-387
- Publication date:
- 2001-06-05
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1573-0964
- ISSN:
-
0039-7857
- URN:
-
uuid:d2d9d916-ac82-494d-82bf-5f54b0b50728
- Local pid:
- ora:4106
- Language:
- English
- Subjects:
- Copyright holder:
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Copyright date:
- 2001
- Notes:
- The final publication is available at www.springerlink.com. N.B. Dr Bostrom is now based at the Faculty of Philosophy, University of Oxford.
Journal article
The Doomsday argument, Adam & Eve, UN⁺⁺, and Quantum Joe
Actions
Authors
Bibliographic Details
Item Description
Terms of use
Metrics
Altmetrics
Dimensions
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record