Journal article icon

Journal article

The role of antimicrobial prophylaxis in the management of snakebite: a systematic review

Abstract:
BackgroundSnakebite, a neglected tropical disease disproportionately affecting lower-income countries, is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Local toxicity and necrosis may result in secondary bacterial infection of bite sites. Despite most guidelines not recommending prophylactic antimicrobials, their use is common in practise. This review aims to systematically assess literature around the use of prophylactic use of antimicrobials in snakebite. We also aim to assess the incidence of secondary infections, types of antimicrobials used, and the aetiology of infections arising from snakebite.MethodsSystematic database searches for studies assessing prophylactic antimicrobial use undertaken. Data was assessed by two reviewers and extracted using a standardised proforma. Included studies were assessed for risk of bias and data extracted narratively. The protocol was prospectively registered on PROSPERO database (CRD42023430752).Results492 studies were screened. Four met the inclusion criteria, totaling 696 patients across three countries. No study found a statistically significant benefit for the use of antibiotic prophylaxis, with no effect on the number or severity of adverse incidents. There were 114 adverse incidences related to secondary infection, with nineteen positive cultures.ConclusionsThis review finds little evidence pertaining to the use of antimicrobial prophylaxis. Studies were highly heterogenous with incomplete reporting of standardised processes. Bacteria isolated supports existing observational data implicating bacteria found in snake oral flora (e.g. M. morganii and Enterococcus spp). This is an important consideration when deciding empirical antimicrobial regimens for suspected superadded infection. International consensus is required to define infection following snakebite and further high-quality research is required to draw definitive conclusions regarding antimicrobial prophylaxis.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Files:
Publisher copy:
10.12688/wellcomeopenres.24701.1

Authors

More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-9828-0420
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author


More from this funder
Funder identifier:
https://ror.org/029chgv08


Publisher:
Taylor and Francis
Journal:
Wellcome Open Research More from this journal
Volume:
10
Pages:
554
Publication date:
2025-10-06
Acceptance date:
2025-09-25
DOI:
EISSN:
2398502X
ISSN:
2398502X
Pmid:
41287797


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
2339666
UUID:
uuid_d21ef165-8fef-4093-8bb7-877fe095b282
Local pid:
pubs:2339666
Source identifiers:
3528477
Deposit date:
2025-12-03
ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP