Journal article
Intuitionism disproved?
- Abstract:
- Perennial philosophers' hopes are unlikely victims of swift, natural deduction. Yet anti-realism has been thought one. Not hoping for anti-realism myself I here show it, lest it be underestimated, to survive the following argument, adapted from W. D.Hart ('Access and Inference', Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, sup. vol. LIII (1979) pp. 156, 164-5; he credits first publication to Fitch).
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Authors
- Publisher:
- Blackwell Publishing
- Journal:
- Analysis More from this journal
- Volume:
- 42
- Issue:
- 4
- Pages:
- 203-207
- Publication date:
- 1982-10-01
- EISSN:
-
1467-8284
- ISSN:
-
0003-2638
- Language:
-
English
- Subjects:
- UUID:
-
uuid:d0aa07fe-1edb-4d46-aaa0-4e3fbfeb89ce
- Local pid:
-
ora:4090
- Deposit date:
-
2010-08-19
- ARK identifier:
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Williamson, T
- Copyright date:
- 1982
- Notes:
- The full-text of this article is not currently available in ORA, but you may be able to access the article via the publisher copy link on this record page. N.B. Tim Williamson is now based at the Faculty of Philosophy, University of Oxford.
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record