Journal article icon

Journal article

Clinical assessment determines the diagnosis of inclusion body myositis independently of pathological features.

Abstract:
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Historically, the diagnosis of sporadic inclusion body myositis (IBM) has required the demonstration of the presence of a number of histopathological findings on muscle biopsy--namely, rimmed vacuoles, an inflammatory infiltrate with invasion of non-necrotic muscle fibres (partial invasion) and amyloid or 15-18 nm tubulofilamentous inclusions (Griggs criteria). However, biopsies of many patients with clinically typical IBM do not show all of these histopathological findings, at least at presentation. We compared the clinical features at presentation and during the course of disease in 67 patients with histopathologically diagnosed IBM and clinically diagnosed IBM seen within a single UK specialist muscle centre. METHODS AND RESULTS: At presentation, using clinically focused diagnostic criteria (European Neuromuscular Centre (ENMC) 2011), a diagnosis of IBM was made in 88% of patients whereas 76% fulfilled the 1997 ENMC criteria and only 27% satisfied the histopathologically focused Griggs criteria. There were no differences in clinical features or outcomes between clinically and histopathologically diagnosed patients, but patients lacking the classical histopathological finding of rimmed vacuoles were younger, suggesting that rimmed vacuoles may be a later feature of the disease. CONCLUSIONS: These findings have important implications for diagnosis and future studies or trials in IBM as adherence to histopathologically focused diagnostic criteria will exclude large numbers of patients with IBM. Importantly, those excluded may be at an earlier stage of the disease and more amenable to treatment.
Publication status:
Published

Actions


Access Document


Publisher copy:
10.1136/jnnp-2013-305690

Authors


More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Clinical Neurosciences
Role:
Author
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Clinical Neurosciences
Role:
Author


Journal:
Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry More from this journal
Volume:
84
Issue:
11
Pages:
1240-1246
Publication date:
2013-11-01
DOI:
EISSN:
1468-330X
ISSN:
0022-3050


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
pubs:414428
UUID:
uuid:cfcd84e5-8a98-4025-9a49-6fb626758cd4
Local pid:
pubs:414428
Source identifiers:
414428
Deposit date:
2013-11-16

Terms of use



Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP