Journal article icon

Journal article

Time trends in prescribing of type 2 diabetes drugs, glycaemic response and risk factors: a retrospective analysis of primary care data, 2010–2017

Abstract:

Aim: To describe population‐level time trends in prescribing patterns of type 2 diabetes therapy, and in short‐term clinical outcomes (glycated haemoglobin [HbA1c], weight, blood pressure, hypoglycaemia and treatment discontinuation) after initiating new therapy.
Materials and methods: We studied 81 532 people with type 2 diabetes initiating a first‐ to fourth‐line drug in primary care between 2010 and 2017 inclusive in United Kingdom electronic health records (Clinical Practice Research Datalink). Trends in new prescriptions and subsequent 6‐ and 12‐month adjusted changes in glycaemic response (reduction in HbA1c), weight, blood pressure and rates of hypoglycaemia and treatment discontinuation were examined.
Results: Use of dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitors as second‐line therapy near doubled (41% of new prescriptions in 2017 vs. 22% in 2010), replacing sulphonylureas as the most common second‐line drug (29% in 2017 vs. 53% in 2010). Sodium‐glucose co‐transporter‐2 inhibitors, introduced in 2013, comprised 17% of new first‐ to fourth‐line prescriptions by 2017. First‐line use of metformin remained stable (91% of new prescriptions in 2017 vs. 91% in 2010). Over the study period there was little change in average glycaemic response and in the proportion of people discontinuing treatment. There was a modest reduction in weight after initiating second‐ and third‐line therapy (improvement in weight change 2017 vs. 2010 for second‐line therapy: −1.5 kg, 95% confidence interval [CI] −1.9, −1.1; P < 0.001), and a slight reduction in systolic blood pressure after initiating first‐, second‐ and third‐line therapy (improvement in systolic blood pressure change 2017 vs. 2010 range: −1.7 to −2.1 mmHg; all P < 0.001). Hypoglycaemia rates decreased over time with second‐line therapy (incidence rate ratio 0.94 per year, 95% CI 0.88, 1.00; P = 0.04), mirroring the decline in use of sulphonylureas.
Conclusions: Recent changes in prescribing of therapy for people with type 2 diabetes have not led to a change in glycaemic response and have resulted in modest improvements in other population‐level short‐term clinical outcomes.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions


Access Document


Publisher copy:
10.1111/dom.13687

Authors


More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Primary Care Health Sciences
Oxford college:
Exeter College
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-6170-4402


Publisher:
Wiley
Journal:
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism More from this journal
Volume:
21
Issue:
7
Pages:
1576-1584
Publication date:
2019-04-04
Acceptance date:
2019-03-01
DOI:
ISSN:
1462-8902


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
pubs:979280
UUID:
uuid:cfc68b42-d4b2-46aa-99cf-87db4d6ee9e9
Local pid:
pubs:979280
Source identifiers:
979280
Deposit date:
2019-03-04

Terms of use



Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP