Antibiotic consumption and time to recovery from uncomplicated urinary tract infection: secondary analysis of observational data from a point-of-care test trial

Journal article

BACKGROUND: Randomised trials provide high-quality evidence on the effects of prescribing antibiotics for urinary tract infection (UTI) but may not reflect the effects in those who consume antibiotics. Moreover, they mostly compare different antibiotic types or regimens but rarely include a ‘no antibiotic’ group. AIM: To estimate the effect of antibiotic consumption, rather than prescription, on time to recovery in females with uncomplicated UTI. DESIGN AND SETTING: Secondary analysis of 14-day observational data from a point-of-care test trial for UTI in primary care in England, the Netherlands, Spain, and Wales, which ran from 2012 to 2014. Clinicians treated patients using their own judgement, providing immediate, delayed, or no antibiotic. METHOD: UTI-symptomatic females who either consumed or did not consume antibiotics during a 14-day follow-up were included. Antibiotic consumption was standardised across participants and grouped into either ≤3 or >3 standardised antibiotic days. To account for confounders, a robust propensity score matching analysis was conducted. Adjusted Kaplan–Meier and Cox proportional hazard models were employed to estimate time to recovery and hazard ratios, respectively. RESULTS: A total of n = 333 females who consumed antibiotics and n = 80 females who did not consume antibiotics were identified and included in the study. The adjusted median time to recovery was 2 days longer among patients who did not consume antibiotics (9 days, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 7 to 12) compared with those who did (7 days, 95% CI = 7 to 8). No difference was found between those who consumed ≤3 (7 days, 95% CI = 7 to 8) compared with >3 standardised antibiotic days (7 days, 95% CI = 6 to 9). CONCLUSION: Consuming antibiotics was associated with a reduction in self-reported time to recovery, but more antibiotics exposure was not associated with faster recovery in this study

Authors: Gadalla, A; Wise, H; Farewell, D; Hughes, K; Llor, C

• Publication status: Published
• Peer review status: Peer reviewed
• Publisher: Royal College of General Practitioners
• Journal: British Journal of General Practice
• Volume: 72
• Issue: 725
• Pages: e882-e890
• Publication date: 2022-09-14
• DOI: 10.3399/bjgp.2022.0011
• EISSN: 1478-5242
• ISSN: 0960-1643
• Language: English
• Keywords: Microbiology; Observational study; Urinary system; Data science; Immunology; Computer science; Intensive care medicine; Test (biology); Point-of-care testing; Antibiotics; Internal medicine; Medicine