Journal article icon

Journal article

Potential inconsistencies in Zika surveillance data and our understanding of risk during pregnancy.

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: A significant increase in microcephaly incidence was reported in Northeast Brazil at the end of 2015, which has since been attributed to an epidemic of Zika virus (ZIKV) infections earlier that year. Further incidence of congenital Zika syndrome (CZS) was expected following waves of ZIKV infection throughout Latin America; however, only modest increases in microcephaly and CZS incidence have since been observed. The quantitative relationship between ZIKV infection, gestational age and congenital outcome remains poorly understood.

METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPLE FINDINGS: We characterised the gestational-age-varying risk of microcephaly given ZIKV infection using publicly available incidence data from multiple locations in Brazil and Colombia. We found that the relative timings and shapes of ZIKV infection and microcephaly incidence curves suggested different gestational risk profiles for different locations, varying in both the duration and magnitude of gestational risk. Data from Northeast Brazil suggested a narrow window of risk during the first trimester, whereas data from Colombia suggested persistent risk throughout pregnancy. We then used the model to estimate which combination of behavioural and reporting changes would have been sufficient to explain the absence of a second microcephaly incidence wave in Bahia, Brazil; a population for which we had two years of data. We found that a 18.9-fold increase in ZIKV infection reporting rate was consistent with observed patterns.

CONCLUSIONS: Our study illustrates how surveillance data may be used in principle to answer key questions in the absence of directed epidemiological studies. However, in this case, we suggest that currently available surveillance data are insufficient to accurately estimate the gestational-age-varying risk of microcephaly from ZIKV infection. The methods used here may be of use in future outbreaks and may help to inform improved surveillance and interpretation in countries yet to experience an outbreak of ZIKV infection.

Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions


Access Document


Publisher copy:
10.1371/journal.pntd.0006991

Authors


More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MPLS Division
Department:
Statistics
Oxford college:
St Peter's College
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-0195-2463
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0001-7904-4804


Publisher:
Public Library of Science
Journal:
PLoS: Neglected Tropical Diseases More from this journal
Volume:
12
Issue:
12
Article number:
e0006991
Publication date:
2018-12-10
Acceptance date:
2018-11-12
DOI:
EISSN:
1935-2735
ISSN:
1935-2727
Pmid:
30532143


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
pubs:954455
UUID:
uuid:cdfda100-e9b6-43f8-a390-b24f8feee01e
Local pid:
pubs:954455
Source identifiers:
954455
Deposit date:
2019-05-24

Terms of use



Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP