Journal article
On the impact of sample size in reconstructing noisy graph signals: a theoretical characterisation
- Abstract:
- Reconstructing a signal on a graph from noisy observations of a subset of the vertices is a fundamental problem in the field of graph signal processing. This paper investigates how sample size affects reconstruction error in the presence of noise via an in-depth theoretical analysis of the two most common reconstruction methods in the literature, least-squares reconstruction (LS) and graph-Laplacian regularised reconstruction (GLR). Our theorems show that at sufficiently low signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs), under these reconstruction methods we may simultaneously decrease sample size and decrease average reconstruction error. We further show that at sufficiently low SNRs, for LS reconstruction we have a Λ-shaped error curve and for GLR reconstruction, a sample size of $O(√ N)$, where N is the total number of vertices, results in lower reconstruction error than near full observation. We present thresholds on the SNRs, $τ$ and $τGLR$, below which the error is non-monotonic, and illustrate these theoretical results with experiments across multiple random graph models, sampling schemes and SNRs. These results demonstrate that any decision in sample-size choice has to be made in light of the noise levels in the data.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Accepted manuscript, pdf, 2.4MB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1109/tsp.2026.3674580
Authors
- Publisher:
- IEEE
- Journal:
- IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing More from this journal
- Volume:
- 74
- Pages:
- 1641-1655
- Publication date:
- 2026-03-18
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1941-0476
- ISSN:
-
1053-587X
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
2396620
- Local pid:
-
pubs:2396620
- Deposit date:
-
2026-05-30
- ARK identifier:
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- IEEE
- Copyright date:
- 2026
- Rights statement:
- Copyright © 2026, IEEE
- Notes:
- The author accepted manuscript (AAM) of this paper has been made available under the University of Oxford's Open Access Publications Policy, and a CC BY public copyright licence has been applied.
- Licence:
- CC Attribution (CC BY)
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record