Ethical governance of artificial intelligence for defence: normative tradeoffs for principle to practice guidance

Journal article

The rapid diffusion of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies in the defence domain raises challenges for the ethical governance of these systems. A recent shift from the what to the how of AI ethics sees a nascent body of literature published by defence organisations focussed on guidance to implement AI ethics principles. These efforts have neglected a crucial intermediate step between principles and guidance concerning the elicitation of ethical requirements for specifying the guidance. In this article, we outline the key normative choices and corresponding tradeoffs that are involved in specifying guidance for the implementation of AI ethics principles in the defence domain. These correspond to: the AI lifecycle model used; the scope of stakeholder involvement; the accountability goals chosen; the choice of auditing requirements; and the choice of mechanisms for transparency and traceability. We provide initial recommendations for navigating these tradeoffs and highlight the importance of a pro-ethical institutional culture.

Authors: Blanchard, A; Thomas, C; Taddeo, M

• Publication status: Published
• Peer review status: Peer reviewed
• Publisher: Springer
• Journal: AI and Society
• Volume: 40
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 185-198
• Publication date: 2024-02-19
• Acceptance date: 2024-01-05
• DOI: 10.1007/s00146-024-01866-7
• EISSN: 1435-5655
• ISSN: 0951-5666
• Language: English
• Keywords: AI in defence; Principle to practices; AI governance; Guidelines; AI lifecycle; AI ethics