Understanding plagiarism linguistic patterns, textual features, and detection methods

Journal article

Plagiarism can be of many different natures, ranging from copying texts to adopting ideas, without giving credit to its originator. This paper presents a new taxonomy of plagiarism that highlights differences between literal plagiarism and intelligent plagiarism, from the plagiarist’s behavioral point of view. The taxonomy supports deep understanding of different linguistic patterns in committing plagiarism, for example, changing texts into semantically equivalent but with different words and organization, shortening texts with concept generalization and specification, and adopting ideas and important contributions of others. Different textual features that characterize different plagiarism types are discussed. Systematic frameworks and methods of monolingual, extrinsic, intrinsic, and cross-lingual plagiarism detection are surveyed and correlated with plagiarism types, which are listed in the taxonomy. We conduct extensive study of state-of-the-art techniques for plagiarism detection, including character n-gram-based (CNG), vector-based (VEC), syntax-based (SYN), semantic-based (SEM), fuzzy-based (FUZZY), structuralbased (STRUC), stylometric-based (STYLE), and cross-lingual techniques (CROSS).Our study corroborates that existing systems for plagiarism detection focus on copying text but fail to detect intelligent plagiarism when ideas are presented in different words.

Authors: Alzahrani, S

• Publication status: Published
• Peer review status: Peer reviewed
• Journal: IEEE Transactions on systems, man, and cybernetics - Part C: Applications and reviews
• Volume: PP
• Issue: 99
• Pages: 1-17
• Publication date: 2011-05-12
• Edition: Accepted Manuscript
• DOI: 10.1109/TSMCC.2011.2134847
• ISSN: 1094-6977
• Language: English
• Keywords: taxonomy; plagiarism; linguistic patterns; plagiarism detection; textual features
• Subjects: Library & information science; Applications and algorithms