Journal article icon

Journal article

Umbrella review of psychosocial and ward-based interventions to reduce self-harm and suicide risks in in-patient mental health settings

Abstract:
Background: Understanding what psychosocial interventions can reduce self-harm and suicide within inpatient mental health settings can be challenging, due to clinical demands and the large volume of published reviews. Aims: To summarise evidence from systematic reviews on psychosocial and ward-level interventions (excluding environmental modifications), for self-harm and suicide that may enhance patient safety in inpatient mental health settings.Methods: We systematically searched Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and CDSR (2013- 2023) for systematic reviews on self-harm and suicide prevention interventions that included inpatient data. Review quality was assessed using AMSTAR-2, primary study overlap via an evidence matrix, and evidence strength evaluated (GRADE algorithm). Findings were narratively synthesised, with input from experts-by-experience throughout. [PROSPERO ID: CRD42023442639]Results: Thirteen systematic reviews (7 meta-analyses, 6 narrative), comprising over 160,000 participants were identified. Based on quantitative reviews, CBT reduces repeat self-harm by follow-up, and DBT decreases the frequency of self-harm. Narrative review evidence suggested that post-discharge follow-up, system, and ward-based interventions (e.g., staff training) may reduce suicide and/or self-harm. However, review quality varied, patient involvement was lacking, and methodological quality of trials informing reviews was predominately low. Overlap was slight (Covered Area= 12.4%).Conclusions: The effectiveness of interventions to prevent self-harm and suicide in inpatient settings remains uncertain due to variable quality reviews, evidence gaps, poor methodological quality of primary studies, and a lack of pragmatic trials and co-production. There is an urgent need for better, co-designed research within inpatient mental health settings.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1192/bjo.2025.10811

Authors

More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-3944-3613
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0001-5820-0935
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-4970-8950
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0009-0001-9235-2489
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-7935-1414


Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Journal:
BJPsych Open More from this journal
Volume:
11
Issue:
5
Pages:
e196-e196
Publication date:
2025-09-08
DOI:
EISSN:
2056-4724
ISSN:
2056-4724


Language:
English
Pubs id:
2380871
Local pid:
pubs:2380871
Source identifiers:
W4414071440
Deposit date:
2026-02-24
ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP