Journal article
Umbrella review of psychosocial and ward-based interventions to reduce self-harm and suicide risks in in-patient mental health settings
- Abstract:
-
Background: Understanding what psychosocial interventions can reduce self-harm and suicide within inpatient mental health settings can be challenging, due to clinical demands and the large volume of published reviews. Aims: To summarise evidence from systematic reviews on psychosocial and ward-level interventions (excluding environmental modifications), for self-harm and suicide that may enhance patient safety in inpatient mental health settings.Methods: We systematically searched Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and CDSR (2013- 2023) for systematic reviews on self-harm and suicide prevention interventions that included inpatient data. Review quality was assessed using AMSTAR-2, primary study overlap via an evidence matrix, and evidence strength evaluated (GRADE algorithm). Findings were narratively synthesised, with input from experts-by-experience throughout. [PROSPERO ID: CRD42023442639]Results: Thirteen systematic reviews (7 meta-analyses, 6 narrative), comprising over 160,000 participants were identified. Based on quantitative reviews, CBT reduces repeat self-harm by follow-up, and DBT decreases the frequency of self-harm. Narrative review evidence suggested that post-discharge follow-up, system, and ward-based interventions (e.g., staff training) may reduce suicide and/or self-harm. However, review quality varied, patient involvement was lacking, and methodological quality of trials informing reviews was predominately low. Overlap was slight (Covered Area= 12.4%).Conclusions: The effectiveness of interventions to prevent self-harm and suicide in inpatient settings remains uncertain due to variable quality reviews, evidence gaps, poor methodological quality of primary studies, and a lack of pragmatic trials and co-production. There is an urgent need for better, co-designed research within inpatient mental health settings.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Version of record, pdf, 675.5KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1192/bjo.2025.10811
Authors
- Publisher:
- Cambridge University Press
- Journal:
- BJPsych Open More from this journal
- Volume:
- 11
- Issue:
- 5
- Pages:
- e196-e196
- Publication date:
- 2025-09-08
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
2056-4724
- ISSN:
-
2056-4724
- Language:
-
English
- Pubs id:
-
2380871
- Local pid:
-
pubs:2380871
- Source identifiers:
-
W4414071440
- Deposit date:
-
2026-02-24
- ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.
Terms of use
- Copyright date:
- 2025
- Licence:
- CC Attribution (CC BY)
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record