Journal article
Reply to Øystein Linnebo and Stewart Shapiro
- Abstract:
-
In reply to Linnebo, I defend my analysis of Tait's argument against the use of classical logic in set theory, and make some preliminary comments on Linnebo's new argument for the same conclusion. I then turn to Shapiro's discussion of intuitionistic analysis and of Smooth Infinitesimal Analysis (SIA). I contend that we can make sense of intuitionistic analysis, but only by attaching deviant meanings to the connectives. Whether anyone can make sense of SIA is open to doubt: doing so would inv...
Expand abstract
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Accepted manuscript, pdf, 336.4KB)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1080/0020174x.2018.1530829
Authors
Bibliographic Details
- Publisher:
- Routledge Publisher's website
- Journal:
- Inquiry Journal website
- Volume:
- 62
- Issue:
- 7
- Pages:
- 842-858
- Publication date:
- 2018-11-17
- Acceptance date:
- 2018-03-07
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1502-3923
- ISSN:
-
0020-174X
Item Description
- Language:
- English
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
pubs:951468
- UUID:
-
uuid:caabc48d-adea-49cb-a219-bd1c2ecf7146
- Local pid:
- pubs:951468
- Source identifiers:
-
951468
- Deposit date:
- 2019-01-28
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Informa UK Limited
- Copyright date:
- 2018
- Rights statement:
- © 2018 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
- Notes:
-
This is the accepted manuscript version of the article. The final version is available from Routledge at:
10.1080/0020174x.2018.1530829
Metrics
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record