Journal article
Reply to Stone on counterpart theory and four-dimensionalism
- Abstract:
- In a recent article, Jim Stone argues that counterpart theory and four-dimensionalism are incompatible. His arguments carry no obvious weight against the stage view defended by Sider. Nor do they undermine the more vulnerable combination of the worm view and counterpart theory – or so I argue.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Accepted manuscript, pdf, 82.0KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1111/j.1467-8284.2007.00667.x
- Publisher:
- Blackwell Publishing
- Journal:
- Analysis More from this journal
- Volume:
- 67
- Issue:
- 294
- Pages:
- 159–162
- Publication date:
- 2007-04-01
- Edition:
- Accepted Manuscript
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1467-8284
- ISSN:
-
0003-2638
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- Subjects:
- UUID:
-
uuid:c98dc2d9-6f6b-4021-ba9a-19dff9e23a15
- Local pid:
-
ora:971
- Deposit date:
-
2008-03-14
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Eagle, A
- Copyright date:
- 2007
- Notes:
- Citation: Eagle, A. (2007). Reply to Stone on counterpart theory and four-dimensionalism. Analysis [Online], 67 (294), 159–162. The definitive version is available at www.blackwell-synergy.com
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record