Journal article icon

Journal article

Precedent and fairness

Abstract:
Courts in common law systems decide cases as they decided like cases in the past—even if they believe they decided those past cases wrongly. What, if anything, justifies this practice? I defend two main claims. The first is that fairness favors treating like cases alike if that means treating them correctly. The second is that, in general, a court is as likely to decide an instant case correctly as it was to decide a previous and like case correctly. Together, these claims tell us that departing from and following precedent are equally likely to yield a correct decision, whereas following precedent may also yield a fair decision. Adhering to precedent is the dominant alternative, as a result. Fairness therefore justifies the practice of precedent. While this conclusion is not original, my argument for it is.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions


Access Document


Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1017/S1352325223000174

Authors


More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
SSD
Department:
Law
Oxford college:
Brasenose College
Role:
Author


Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Journal:
Legal Theory More from this journal
Volume:
29
Issue:
3
Pages:
185-201
Publication date:
2023-10-24
Acceptance date:
2023-07-13
DOI:
EISSN:
1469-8048
ISSN:
1352-3252


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
1492417
Local pid:
pubs:1492417
Deposit date:
2023-07-13

Terms of use



Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP