Journal article
New instrumentation improves patient satisfaction and component positioning for mobile-bearing medial unicompartmental knee replacement
- Abstract:
- Background: The Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement (OUKR) has achieved excellent functional outcomes and long term survivorship in many single center and single surgeon series. However, in national registries, the failure rates are up to three times higher than total knee replacement. This is at least in part due to difficulty experienced by low-volume surgeons in implanting the prosthesis accurately. A new instrumentation system (Microplasty) was introduced to help surgeons achieve better component positioning, however, it is not known whether the new instruments achieve that goal. This study investigates whether the new system achieves better component positioning and whether it improves the clinical outcomes when compared to the existing instruments. Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study compared 50 consecutive OUKR implanted using the conventional Phase 3 instrumentation with 100 consecutive OUKR implanted using the new Microplasty instrumentation. Component orientation was measured on postoperative radiographs, and the percentage outside the recommended range was identified. Intraoperative data and retrospectively collected clinical data were also analyzed. Results: Femoral component alignment improved significantly, and there were no outliers in the Microplasty group. Although there were fewer tibial component alignment outliers with Microplasty, the difference was not significant. The intraoperative incidence of tibial recut, patient satisfaction and patient expectations was significantly better in the Microplasty group. The Oxford Knee Scores were also better with Microplasty, however, the difference was not significant. Conclusion: Microplasty instrumentation helps the surgeon achieve optimal component positioning and reduces the need for tibial recut. The clinical outcomes are also better with the Microplasty instrumentation.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Accepted manuscript, pdf, 209.3KB, Terms of use)
-
(Preview, Accepted manuscript, pdf, 62.3KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_172_17
Authors
- Publisher:
- Medknow Publications
- Journal:
- Indian Journal of Orthopaedics More from this journal
- Volume:
- 53
- Issue:
- 2
- Pages:
- 289-296
- Publication date:
- 2019-02-22
- Acceptance date:
- 2018-07-25
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1998-3727
- ISSN:
-
0019-5413
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
pubs:891177
- UUID:
-
uuid:c840209d-77b7-4384-9162-71e50959a5e9
- Local pid:
-
pubs:891177
- Source identifiers:
-
891177
- Deposit date:
-
2018-07-25
- ARK identifier:
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Indian Journal of Orthopaedics
- Copyright date:
- 2019
- Notes:
- Copyright © Indian Journal of Orthopaedics. This is the accepted manuscript version of the article. The final version is available online from the publisher at: https://doi.org/10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_172_17
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record