Journal article icon

Journal article

Rates of self-harm presenting to general hospitals: a comparison of data from the Multicentre Study of Self-Harm in England and Hospital Episode Statistics

Abstract:
Rates of hospital presentation for self-harm in England were compared using different national and local data sources.The study was descriptive and compared bespoke data collection methods for recording self-harm presentations to hospital with routinely collected hospital data.Local area data on self-harm from the 3 centres of the Multicentre Study of Self-harm in England (Oxford, Manchester and Derby) were used along with national and local routinely collected data on self-harm admissions and emergency department attendances from Hospital Episode Statistics (HES).Rate ratios were calculated to compare rates of self-harm generated using different data sources nationally and locally (between 2010 and 2012) and rates of hospital presentations for self-harm were plotted over time (between 2003 and 2012), based on different data sources.The total number of self-harm episodes between 2010 and 2012 was 13,547 based on Multicentre Study data, 9600 based on HES emergency department data and 8096 based on HES admission data. Nationally, routine HES data underestimated overall rates of self-harm by approximately 60% compared with rates based on Multicentre Study data (rate ratio for HES emergency department data, 0.41 (95% CI 0.35 to 0.49); rate ratio for HES admission data, 0.42 (95% CI 0.36 to 0.49)). Direct local area comparisons confirmed an overall underascertainment in the HES data, although the difference varied between centres. There was a general increase in self-harm over time according to HES data which contrasted with a fall and then a rise in the Multicentre Study data.There was a consistent underestimation of presentations for self-harm recorded by HES emergency department data, and fluctuations in year-on-year figures. HES admission data appeared more reliable but missed non-admitted episodes. Routinely collected data may miss important trends in self-harm and cannot be used in isolation as the basis for a robust national indicator of self-harm.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions


Access Document


Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009749

Authors


More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Oxford college:
Green Templeton College
Role:
Author
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Psychiatry
Role:
Author


Publisher:
BMJ Publishing Group
Journal:
BMJ Open More from this journal
Volume:
6
Pages:
e009749
Publication date:
2016-02-16
Acceptance date:
2015-11-24
DOI:
ISSN:
2044-6055
Pmid:
26883238


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
pubs:605906
UUID:
uuid:c76a3694-a679-4349-af6f-c6fb528b21f7
Local pid:
pubs:605906
Source identifiers:
605906
Deposit date:
2017-05-25

Terms of use



Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP