Journal article icon

Journal article

GP’s role in supporting women with anal incontinence after childbirth injury: a qualitative study

Abstract:
Background: Obstetric anal sphincter injury is the most common cause of anal incontinence for women, which often has profound impacts on women’s lives. GPs offer a first line of contact for many women, but we know that very few women experiencing anal incontinence postnatally report discussing it with their GPs.Aim: To identify key ways in which GPs can support women with anal incontinence caused by childbirth injuries.Design and setting: A qualitative study investigating women’s experiences with their GP, and GPs’ perspectives about providing such care.Method: This qualitative study combined two phases: first, a series of in-depth semi-structured interviews with women experiencing anal incontinence caused by childbirth injuries (n = 41); and second, focus groups with GPs (n = 13) stratified by experience. Thematic analysis was conducted and relevant themes from across the two datasets were examined.Results: Mediating factors in GP care for women with anal incontinence caused by childbirth injuries centred around three key themes: the role of the GP, access and pathways, and communication.Conclusion: The findings demonstrate multifactorial challenges in identifying the problem and supporting women experiencing anal incontinence after childbirth injury in primary care settings. Many GPs lacked confidence in their role in supporting women, and women were often reluctant to seek help. Those women who did seek help often experienced frustrations consulting with their GPs. In a context where women are often reluctant to ask for help, their concerns are not always taken seriously, and where GPs do not routinely ask about anal incontinence, potential anal incontinence after childbirth injury appears to be often missed in a primary care setting
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Files:
Publisher copy:
10.3399/bjgp.2023.0356
Publication website:
https://pure-oai.bham.ac.uk/ws/files/254730317/e587.full.pdf

Authors

More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-9792-8299
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-6542-8492
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-8557-7276
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-0218-2066


Publisher:
Royal College of General Practitioners
Journal:
British Journal of General Practice More from this journal
Volume:
74
Issue:
746
Pages:
e587-e594
Publication date:
2024-02-15
Acceptance date:
2024-01-03
DOI:
EISSN:
1478-5242
ISSN:
0960-1643


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
1692093
Local pid:
pubs:1692093
Source identifiers:
W4391872529
Deposit date:
2026-06-08
ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP