Journal article icon

Journal article

Meta-analysis of longitudinal neurocognitive performance in people at clinical high-risk for psychosis

Abstract:
Persons at clinical high-risk for psychosis (CHR) are characterised by specific neurocognitive deficits. However, the course of neurocognitive performance during the prodromal period and over the onset of psychosis remains unclear. The aim of this meta-analysis was to synthesise results from follow-up studies of CHR individuals to examine longitudinal changes in neurocognitive performance. Three electronic databases were systematically searched to identify articles published up to 31 December 2021. Thirteen studies met inclusion criteria. Study effect sizes (Hedges' g) were calculated and pooled for each neurocognitive task using random-effects meta-analyses. We examined whether changes in performance between baseline and follow-up assessments differed between: (1) CHR and healthy control (HC) individuals, and (2) CHR who did (CHR-T) and did not transition to psychosis (CHR-NT). Meta-analyses found that HC individuals had greater improvements in performance over time compared to CHR for letter fluency (g = -0.32, p = 0.029) and digit span (g = -0.30, p = 0.011) tasks. Second, there were differences in longitudinal performance of CHR-T and CHR-NT in trail making test A (TMT-A) (g = 0.24, p = 0.014) and symbol coding (g = -0.51, p = 0.011). Whilst CHR-NT improved in performance on both tasks, CHR-T improved to a lesser extent in TMT-A and had worsened performance in symbol coding over time. Together, neurocognitive performance generally improved in all groups at follow-up. Yet, evidence suggested that improvements were less pronounced for an overall CHR group, and specifically for CHR-T, in processing speed tasks which may be a relevant domain for interventions aimed to enhance neurocognition in CHR populations.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1017/s0033291722001830

Authors

More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-0543-4516
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-2135-5495
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0009-0006-6095-254X
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-4381-0532
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-4156-9506


Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Journal:
Psychological Medicine More from this journal
Volume:
52
Issue:
11
Pages:
2009-2016
Publication date:
2022-07-13
DOI:
EISSN:
1469-8978
ISSN:
0033-2917


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
2359180
Local pid:
pubs:2359180
Source identifiers:
W4285087155
Deposit date:
2026-01-15
ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP