Journal article icon

Journal article

No clinical and functional benefit after medial congruent compared to ultra congruent total knee arthroplasty at 1 year: A prospective randomized controlled study

Abstract:
Purpose: Various conforming bearing designs are used during total knee arthroplasty (TKA), yet their impact on clinical outcomes remains uncertain. In recent years, the use of medial congruent (MC) and ultra congruent (UC) onlays has gained popularity. Hence, this study aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes of MC onlays compared to UC onlays in TKA. Methods: A prospective randomized controlled trial including 80 patients with advanced varus knee osteoarthritis undergoing primary TKA was conducted. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either a MC (n = 40) or UC insert (n = 40). Seventy‐six patients (MC = 38; UC = 38) completed the 12‐month follow‐up. The primary outcome was the Knee Society Score (KSS), assessed preoperatively, at 6 weeks and 12 months postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included range of motion (ROM) and patient‐reported outcome measures (PROMs): Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Forgotten Joint Score (FJS‐12) and High‐Activity Arthroplasty Score (HAAS) at 3, 6 and 12 months. Patient satisfaction, recommendation and willingness to undergo the procedure again were evaluated at 12 months. Radiographic alignment was assessed pre‐ and postoperatively. Results: Both groups showed significant improvement in the primary outcome KSS (MC: 87.6 ± 24.9 to 172.2 ± 20.3; UC: 94.2 ± 20.6 to 174.0 ± 23.7; p < 0.001 within both groups), ROM and PROMs without significant intergroup differences at any time point (all p > 0.05). The overall satisfaction rate (very satisfied + satisfied) was 94.7% in the MC group and 92.1% in the UC group with no significant difference in the distribution of satisfaction responses between groups (p = 0.994). Conclusion: Both MC and UC inserts provided excellent clinical and functional outcomes 1 year after TKA, with high patient satisfaction and no statistically significant differences between designs. Thus, MC or UC designs may be chosen according to surgeon preference. Level of Evidence: Level I.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1002/ksa.70482

Authors

More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-2696-1769
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0001-7798-3306
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-7321-219X
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0001-8901-5898


Publisher:
Wiley
Journal:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy More from this journal
Article number:
ksa.70482
Publication date:
2026-06-15
Acceptance date:
2026-04-26
DOI:
EISSN:
1433-7347
ISSN:
0942-2056


Language:
English
Keywords:
Source identifiers:
4231845
Deposit date:
2026-06-15
ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP