Journal article

Executive aggrandizement in established democracies: a crisis of liberal democratic constitutionalism

Publication status:: Published

Peer review status:: Peer reviewed

Actions

Email

Email this record

Send the bibliographic details of this record to your email address.

Your Email
Please enter the email address that the record information will be sent to.

-
Your message (optional)
Please add any additional information to be included within the email.
Cite

Cite this record

APA Style

Khaitan, T. (2019). Executive aggrandizement in established democracies: a crisis of liberal democratic constitutionalism. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 17(1), 342–356.

MLA Style

Khaitan, T. “Executive Aggrandizement in Established Democracies: a Crisis of Liberal Democratic Constitutionalism.” International Journal of Constitutional Law, vol. 17, no. 1, Oxford University Press, 2019, pp. 342–56.

Chicago Style

Khaitan, T. 2019. “Executive Aggrandizement in Established Democracies: a Crisis of Liberal Democratic Constitutionalism.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 17 (1): 342–56.
Share
Print

Access Document

Files:: Khaitan_2019_Executive_aggrandizement_in.pdf

(Preview, Accepted manuscript, pdf, 301.5KB, Terms of use)

Publisher copy:: 10.1093/icon/moz018

Authors

+ Khaitan, T More by this author

Institution:: University of Oxford
Division:: SSD
Department:: Law
Oxford college:: Wadham College
Role:: Author
ORCID:: 0000-0003-3661-4832

Publisher:: Oxford University Press
Journal:: International Journal of Constitutional Law More from this journal
Volume:: 17
Issue:: 1
Pages:: 342-356
Publication date:: 2019-05-06
DOI:: 10.1093/icon/moz018
EISSN:: 1474-2659
ISSN:: 1474-2640

Language:: English
Keywords:: FFR

executive aggrandizement

constitutional democracy

comparative constitutional law

democratic backsliding
Pubs id:: 975942
Local pid:: pubs:975942
Deposit date:: 2023-01-24

Terms of use

Copyright holder:: Khaitan, T
Copyright date:: 2019
Rights statement:: © The Author(s) 2019. Oxford University Press and New York University School of Law. All rights reserved.
Notes:: This is the accepted manuscript version of the article. The final version is available online from Oxford University Press at: https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moz018 A correction to the article is available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moac091

Licence:: Terms and Conditions of Use for Oxford University Research Archive

Views and Downloads

About views and downloads

If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP